Back

Natural selection promotes the evolution of recombination 1: among selected genotypes

Gerrish, P. J.; Galeota-Sprung, B. J.; Sniegowski, P. D.; Chevallier, J.; Ycart, B.

2021-06-21 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2021.06.07.447320 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Shuffling ones genetic material with another individual seems a risky endeavor more likely to decrease than to increase offspring fitness. This intuitive argument is commonly employed to explain why the ubiquity of sex and recombination in nature is enigmatic. It is predicated on the notion that natural selection assembles selectively well-matched combinations of genes that recombination would break up resulting in low-fitness offspring - a notion often stated in the literature as a self-evident premise. We show however that, upon closer examination, this premise is flawed: we find to the contrary that natural selection in fact has an encompassing tendency to assemble selectively mismatched gene combinations; recombination breaks up these selectively mismatched combinations (on average), assembles selectively matched combinations, and should thus be favored. The new perspective our findings offer suggests that sex and recombination are not so enigmatic but are instead unavoidable byproducts of natural selection.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Theoretical Population Biology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
45.5%
2
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
4
Journal of Mathematical Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
6
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.4%
8
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
9
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
10
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.5%
12
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
14
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.1%
18
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
Entropy
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Journal of Computational Biology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.6%