Back

Targeted anti-BCR-ABL+ ALL therapy may benefit the heart

Kirchhoff, H.; Ricke-Hoch, M.; Wohlan, K.; Pietzsch, S.; Karsli, U.; Erschow, S.; Zweigerdt, R.; Ganser, A.; Eder, M.; Scherr, M.; Hilfiker-Kleiner, D.

2021-06-06 cancer biology
10.1101/2021.06.04.447070 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Targeted therapies are currently considered the best cost-benefit anti-cancer treatment. In hematological malignancies, however, relapse rates and non-hematopoietic side effects including cardiotoxicity remain high. We here describe significant heart damage due to advanced acute lymphoblastic leukemia with t(9;22) encoding the bcr-abl oncogene (BCR-ABL+ ALL) in murine xenotransplantation models. Echocardiography reveals severe cardiac dysfunction with impaired left ventricular function and reduced heart and cardiomyocyte dimensions associated with increased apoptosis. This cardiac damage is fully reversible, but cardiac recovery depends on the therapy used to induce ALL remission. Chemotherapy-free therapy with dasatinib and venetoclax (targeting the BCR-ABL oncoprotein and mitochondrial Bcl2, respectively), as well as dexamethasone can fully revert cardiac defects whereas depletion of otherwise identical ALL in a genetic model using HSV-TK cannot. Mechanistically, dexamethasone induces pro-apoptotic BIM expression and apoptosis in ALL cells but enhances pro-survival BCLXL expression in cardiomyocytes and clinical recovery with reversion of cardiac atrophy. These data demonstrate that therapies designed to optimize apoptosis induction in ALL may circumvent cardiac on-target side effects and may even activate cardiac recovery. In the future, combining careful clinical monitoring of cardiotoxicity in leukemic patients with further characterization of organ-specific side effects and signaling pathways activated by malignancy and/or anti-tumor therapies seems reasonable.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.