Depth of sedation with dexmedetomidine modulates cortical excitability non-linearly
Cardone, P.; Bodart, O.; Kirsch, M.; Sanfilippo, J.; Virgilitto, A.; Martial, C.; Simon, J.; Wannez, S.; Sanders, R. D.; Laureys, S.; Massimini, M.; Bonhomme, V.; Gosseries, O.
Show abstract
BackgroundCortical excitability changes across conscious states, being higher in unconsciousness compared to normal wakefulness. Anaesthesia offers controlled manipulation to investigate conscious processes and underlying brain dynamics. Among commonly used anaesthetic agents, dexmedetomidine (DEX) effects are not completely known. In this study, we investigated cortical excitability as a function of DEX sedation depth. MethodsTranscranial magnetic stimulation coupled with electroencephalography was recorded in 20 healthy subjects undergoing DEX sedation in four conditions (baseline, light sedation, deep sedation, recovery). Frontal and parietal cortices were stimulated using a neuronavigation system. Cortical excitability was inferred by slope, amplitude, positive and negative peak latencies of the first component (0-30 ms) of the TMS-evoked potential. Four Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) were used to test the effect of condition and brain region over cortical excitability. ResultsDexmedetomidine modulated amplitude (P<0.001), slope (P=0.0001) and positive peak (P=0.042), while the targeted brain region affected amplitude (P<0.001), slope (P<0.001), and negative peak (P=0.001). The interaction between dexmedetomidine and region had an effect over amplitude (P=0.004), and slope (P=0.009) such that cortical excitability was higher during all conditions where DEX was present as compared to the baseline. ConclusionsCortical excitability changes non-linearly as a function of the depth of DEX sedation, with a paradoxical non dose-dependent increase. The effect is region-specific, being present in the frontal but not in the parietal region. Future research should extend the current results with other anaesthetics to better understand the link between cortical excitability and depth of sedation.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison of GABA-ergic (propofol) and non-GABA-ergic (dexmedetomidine) sedation on visual and motor cortical oscillations, using magnetoencephalography. 97%
- Glutamate-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (GluCEST) Detects Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Motor Cortex 94%
- Effects of tDCS Dose and Electrode Montage on regional cerebral blood flow and motor behavior 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reliability of resting-state EEG modulation by continuous and intermittent theta burst stimulation of the primary motor cortex: A sham-controlled study 94%
- Decoding personalized motor cortical excitability states from human electroencephalography 94%
- Evaluating phasic transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) with pupil dilation: the importance of stimulation intensity and sensory perception 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.