Robustness and bias of European excess death estimates in 2020 under varying model specifications
Schöley, J.
Show abstract
Various procedures are in use to calculate excess deaths during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Using weekly death counts from 20 European countries, we evaluate the robustness of excess death estimates to the choice of model for expected deaths and perform a cross-validation analysis to assess the error and bias in each models predicted death counts. We find that the different models produce very similar patterns of weekly excess deaths but disagree substantially on the level of excess. While the exact country ranking along percent excess death in 2020 is sensitive to the choice of model the top and bottom ranks are robustly identified. On the country level, the 5-year average death rate model tends to produce the lowest excess death estimates, whereas high excess deaths are produced by the popular 5-year average death count and Euromomo-style Serfling models. Cross-validation revealed these estimates to be biased under a causal interpretation of "expected deaths had COVID-19 not happened."
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimation of introduction and transmission rates of SARS-CoV-2 in a prospective household study 94%
- Near-term forecasting of Covid-19 cases and hospitalisations in Aotearoa New Zealand 93%
- Estimating the epidemic reproduction number from temporally aggregated incidence data: a statistical modelling approach and software tool 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic through life expectancy losses: a population-level study of 29 countries 93%
- Changes in stillbirths and child and youth mortality in 2020 and 2021 during the Covid-19 pandemic 93%
- Reweighting the UK Biobank to reflect its underlying sampling population substantially reduces pervasive selection bias due to volunteering 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Global predictions of short- to medium-term COVID-19 transmission trends : a retrospective assessment 94%
- A causal inference approach for estimating effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions during Covid-19 pandemic 94%
- Was R < 1 before the English lockdowns? On modelling mechanistic detail, causality and inference about Covid-19 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.