Back

TRAK proteins encode distinct MIRO-dependent and MIRO-independent mechanisms for associating with the mitochondrial outer membrane

Mitchell, L.; Reda, K. E.; Fatima, H.; Vasquez, C. E.; Quintero-Carmona, O. A.

2021-06-04 cell biology
10.1101/2021.06.03.446977 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Current models suggest that MIRO GTPases anchor cytoskeletal motors to the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM). However, our previous findings indicate that the unconventional myosin, MYO19, interacts with MIRO weakly and that a MIRO-independent MOM-localizing domain interacts more tightly with the MOM. To test the hypothesis that other MIRO interactors may also have MIRO-independent MOM-binding, we examined interactions between TRAK proteins (microtubule motor-mitochondria adaptor proteins) and the MOM via quantitative fluorescence microscopy and steady-state kinetic approaches. Using GFP-TRAK truncations expressed in MIRO1-2 double knockout mouse embryonic fibroblasts, we identified a MIRO-independent mitochondrial binding domain in the C-terminus of TRAK1 and TRAK2, sufficient for MOM-localization similar to what we observed for full length GFP-TRAK proteins. The MIRO-binding domains (MBD) of the TRAK proteins were only able to localize to mitochondria in the presence of ectopic expression of MIRO. Importantly, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) demonstrated that the steady-state kinetics of TRAKMBD/MIRO interactions were faster-exchanging than for either full-length TRAK or the TRAK C-terminal MOM-binding domain expressed alone. These data support a model where faster-exchanging TRAK/MIRO associations could support initial association and/or TRAK activation, while MIRO-independent binding contributes significantly to tighter association to the MOM.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.