Prevalence of long-term effects in individuals diagnosed with COVID-19: a living systematic review
Reyes Domingo, F.; Waddell, L. A.; Cheung, A. M.; Cooper, C. L.; Belcourt, V. J.; Zuckermann, A. M. E.; Corrin, T.; Ahmad, R.; Boland, L.; Laprise, C.; Idzerda, L.; Khan, A.; Jaramillo Garcia, A.
Show abstract
ObjectivePost COVID-19 condition refers to persisting or recurring symptoms weeks after acute COVID-19 illness which can significantly impact quality of life and health systems. It is important to understand the manifestation and magnitude of this condition. The objective of this living systematic review is to summarize the prevalence of symptoms and sequelae reported by people [≥]4 weeks after COVID-19 diagnosis. DesignSystematic review, meta-analysis and narrative synthesis. Data sourcesEmbase, Medline, PsychInfo, Cochrane Central and select grey literature up to April 14, 2021. MethodsWe adapted a previous search strategy used by the U.K. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and updated it to search for new literature. Two reviewers screened references independently; one extracted data and assessed risk of bias and certainty of the evidence while another verified them. Prevalence data from laboratory-confirmed populations were meta-analyzed using a random effects model and synthesized separately in the short-term (4-12 weeks) and long-term (>12 weeks) periods after diagnosis. Data from clinically-diagnosed populations were synthesized narratively. ResultsOf the 4444 unique citations, 84 observational studies met our inclusion criteria. Over 100 post COVID-19 symptoms and sequelae were reported. Sixty-one percent (95% CI: 44-76%, low certainty) and 53% (95% CI: 41-65%, low certainty) of laboratory-confirmed individuals reported persistence or presence of one or more symptoms in the short- and long-term periods, respectively. The most prevalent symptoms in both periods included: fatigue, general pain or discomfort, shortness of breath, cognitive impairment and mental health symptoms. ConclusionsA substantial proportion of individuals reported a variety of symptoms [≥]4 weeks after COVID-19 diagnosis. Due to gaps in the research base, and the low certainty of the evidence currently available, further research is needed to determine the true burden of post COVID-19 condition in the general population and in specific subgroups. PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021231476.
Matching journals
The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Burden of Post-COVID-19 Syndrome and Implications for Healthcare Service Planning: A Population-based Cohort Study 94%
- Population risk factors for severe disease and mortality in COVID-19: A global systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Characteristics of Long Covid: findings from a social media survey 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking Persistent Symptoms in Scotland (TraPSS): A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study of COVID-19 Recovery After Mild Acute Infection 94%
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 93%
- The patient experience of COVID-19: A qualitative investigation with symptomatic outpatients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bias as a source of inconsistency in ivermectin trials for COVID-19: A systematic review 92%
- Characteristics and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews of prevalence studies in adult populations: a meta-epidemiological study 92%
- Clinical Trials in COVID-19 Management & Prevention: A Meta-epidemiological Study examining methodological quality 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Occurrence and transmission potential of asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections: update of a living systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Overall and cause-specific hospitalisation and death after COVID-19 hospitalisation in England: cohort study in OpenSAFELY using linked primary care, secondary care and death registration data 92%
- A Systematic Review of Machine Learning-based Prognostic Models for Acute Pancreatitis: Towards Improving Methods and Reporting Quality 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Epidemiology of post-COVID syndrome following hospitalisation with coronavirus: a retrospective cohort study 92%
- Myocarditis and Pericarditis following COVID-19 Vaccination: Rapid Systematic Review of Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Course 92%
- Clinical Severity and mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness for Omicron, Delta, and Alpha SARS-CoV-2 Variants in the United States: A Prospective Observational Study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.