Back

CHST6-related macular corneal dystrophy: a matter of endothelium

Zhang, B. N.; Qi, B.; Wang, X.; Dong, C.; Cheng, J.; Li, D.; Li, S.; Chen, M.; Zhang, B.; Zhou, Q.; Xie, L.

2021-06-03 ophthalmology
10.1101/2021.05.31.21258099
Show abstract

Macular corneal dystrophy (MCD) is classified as corneal stromal dystrophy. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcomes of 118 MCD patients receiving surgical treatment in the past 30 years and found patients receiving penetrating keratoplasty had the lowest recurrence rate 13.75%, compared with 40.91% patients receiving deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and 25% receiving phototherapeutic keratectomy. Transcriptomic analysis in human corneal single-cell sequencing atlas found the MCD pathogenic gene CHST6 was abundant in corneal endothelium rather than other cell types. CHST6 protein showed a similar expression pattern to its mRNA. The mouse homologous gene Chst5 was 120-fold higher in corneal endothelium than in the epithelial and stromal layers. Mice with specifically Chst5 knockdown in the endothelial layer by microinjection of the adeno-associated virus serotype 9 - shRNA plasmids into the anterior chamber, rather than Chst5 knockdown into the stroma, showed MCD-like phenotypes. Corneal opacification and abnormally larger collagen fibrils were observed in the endothelial Chst5 knockdown mice. The same corneal characteristics were observed after overexpressing human CHST6 mutant R50H in the mouse endothelium. These observations indicating the pathogenesis of MCD is more related to the corneal endothelium rather than the stroma. Significance StatementOur study gave evidence that corneal endothelium contributing more to the macular corneal dystrophy (MCD) development, rather than other cell types in the cornea. We proposed penetrating keratoplasty might serve as a more proper surgical treatment for MCD according to the recurrence rate analysis. We also provided a novel method to construct MCD mouse model.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 13%
10.9%
3
Ophthalmology Science
based on 15 papers
Top 0.4%
8.1%
4
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 60%
6.8%
5
Eye
based on 11 papers
Top 0.7%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Translational Vision Science & Technology
based on 18 papers
Top 0.8%
5.7%
7
British Journal of Ophthalmology
based on 13 papers
Top 0.7%
5.7%
8
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 3%
5.4%
9
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
Annals of Translational Medicine
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
2.4%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
based on 39 papers
Top 1%
1.9%
12
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Human Genetics
based on 14 papers
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 32%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 15%
1.3%
16
F1000Research
based on 28 papers
Top 4%
0.9%
17
Communications Biology
based on 36 papers
Top 4%
0.9%
18
npj Genomic Medicine
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Rheumatology
based on 21 papers
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 14%
0.9%
21
Journal of Medical Genetics
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Endocrinology
based on 20 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Vaccines
based on 131 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Clinical and Translational Science
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
26
BMC Genomics
based on 15 papers
Top 0.7%
0.7%