Distinct threat and valence signals in rat nucleus accumbens core
Ray, M. H.; Moaddab, M.; McDannald, M. A.
Show abstract
Appropriate responding to threat and reward is essential to survival. The nucleus accumbens core (NAcc) is known to support and organize reward behavior. More recently our laboratory has shown the NAcc is necessary to discriminate cues for threat and safety. To directly reveal NAcc threat responding, we recorded single-unit activity from 7 female rats undergoing Pavlovian fear discrimination. Rats fully discriminated cues for danger, uncertainty, and safety. Demonstrating direct threat responding, most NAcc neurons showed greatest firing changes to danger and uncertainty. Heterogeneity in cue and reward firing led to the detection of multiple, functional populations. One NAcc population specifically decreased firing to threat (danger and uncertainty). A separate population bi-directionally signaled valence through firing decreases to negative valence events (danger and uncertainty) and opposing firing increases to positive valence events (reward and safety onset). The findings point to the NAcc as a neural source of threat information and a more general valence hub.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Lateral entorhinal cortex suppresses drift in cortical memory representations. 98%
- Prefrontal neural ensembles develop selective code for stimulus associations within minutes of novel experiences. 98%
- Hippocampal sharp-wave ripples decrease during physical actions including consummatory behavior in immobile rodents 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A context-dependent switch from sensing to feeling in the primate amygdala 95%
- Sharp-wave ripple associated activity in the medial prefrontal cortex supports spatial rule switching 95%
- A neural system that represents the association of odors with rewarded outcomes and promotes behavioral engagement 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.