Description and clinical validation of a real-time AI diagnostic companion for fetal ultrasound examination
Stirnemann, J.; Besson, R.; Spaggiari, E.; Rojo, S.; Loge, F.; Peyro-Saint-Paul, H.; Allassonniere, S.; Le Pennec, E.; Attie-Bitach, T.; Villes, Y.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo describe a real-time decision support system (DSS), named SONIO, to assist ultrasound-based prenatal diagnosis and to assess its performance using a clinical database of precisely phenotyped postmortem examinations. Population and MethodsThis DSS is knowledge-based and comprises a dedicated thesaurus of 294 syndromes and diseases. It operates by suggesting, at each step of the ultrasound examination, the best next symptom to check for in order to optimize the diagnostic pathway to the smallest number of possible diagnoses. This assistant was tested on a single-center database of 251 cases of postmortem phenotypes with a definite diagnosis. Adjudication of discordant diagnoses was made by a panel of external experts. The primary outcome was a target concordance rate >90% between the postmortem diagnosis and the top-7 diagnoses given by SONIO when providing the full phenotype as input. Secondary outcomes included concordance for the top-5 and top-3 diagnoses; We also assessed a "1-by-1" model, providing only the anomalies sequentially prompted by the system, mimicking the use of the software in a real-life clinical setting. ResultsThe validation database covered 96 of the 294 (32.65%) syndromes and 79% of their overall prevalence in the SONIO thesaurus. The adjudicators discarded 42/251 cases as they were not amenable to ultrasound based diagnosis. SONIO failed to make the diagnosis on 7/209 cases. On average, each case displayed 6 anomalies, 3 of which were considered atypical for the condition. Using the full-phenotype model, the success rate of the top-7 output of Sonio was 96.7% (202/209). This was 91.9% and 87.1% for the top-5 and top-3 outputs respectively. Using the "1-by-1" model, the correct diagnosis was within the top-7, top-5 and top-3 of SONIOs output in 72.4%, 69.3% and 63.1%. ConclusionSonio is a robust DSS with a success-rate >95% for top-7 ranking diagnoses when the full phenotype is provided, using a large database of noisy real data. The success rate over 70% using the 1-by-1 model was understandably lower, given that SONIOs sequential queries may not systematically cover the full phenotype.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The LMSz method - an automatable scalable approach to constructing gene-specific growth charts in rare disorders. 92%
- Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists 91%
- Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of GPT-4 in Five Thousand Rare Disease Cases 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive phenotyping of 3q29 deletion syndrome: recommendations for clinical care 91%
- The Human Intolerome: a curated database to prioritize genomic variants in stillbirth, pregnancy loss, and neonatal death 91%
- Towards robust clinical genome interpretation: developing a consistent terminology to characterize disease-gene relationships - allelic requirement, inheritance modes and disease mechanisms 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-invasive prenatal testing by low coverage genomic sequencing: Detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions 94%
- Longitudinal ultrasonic dimensions and parametric solid models of the gravid uterus and cervix 93%
- Computational framework for targeted high-coverage sequencing based NIPT 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- REVEL is better at predicting pathogenicity of loss-of-function than gain-of-function variants 91%
- STRipy: a graphical application for enhanced genotyping of pathogenic short tandem repeats in sequencing data 90%
- Using single molecule Molecular Inversion Probes as a cost-effective, high-throughput sequencing approach to target all genes and loci associated with macular diseases 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.