Pollinator habitat plantings benefit wild, native bees, but do not necessarily favor rare species
Cariveau, D. P.; Roswell, M.; Harrison, T.; Genung, M. A.; Gibbs, J.; Winfree, R.
Show abstract
O_LIInstalling pollinator habitat is a ubiquitous conservation tool, but little is known about which pollinator taxa require support, or which benefit from habitat installations. C_LIO_LIWe studied the response of rare and common bees to pollinator habitat enhancement. We used independent regional datasets to designate bee species as common or rare based on their rank according to one of three metrics: a) site occurrence frequency, b) local relative abundance, and c) geographic range size. We asked whether the abundance or richness of rare and common bees were greater in pollinator habitat, relative to old-field controls. Because we used an arbitrary, quantile-based cutoff to categorize species rarity, we conducted sensitivity analysis and controlled for rarity classification errors with a null model. With this null model, we determined whether rare and/or common species responded to pollinator habitat disproportionately, compared to the expectation for typical bee species. C_LIO_LIWe found that the number of individuals and of species designated as rare based on local relative abundance was greater in pollinator habitat enhancements. The number of individuals from bee species designated as rare based on site occurrence was lower in pollinator habitat enhancements, but the number of species was not clearly different between habitat types. We did not find a clear positive nor negative effect of habitat enhancement for species designated rare based on geographic range size. For all three rarity metrics, common species increased in abundance and richness in pollinator habitat relative to controls. Null models indicated that in most cases, neither rare nor common species disproportionately benefited from pollinator habitat. C_LIO_LISynthesis and Applications: Our results suggest that pollinator habitat can lead to an increase in the abundance and richness of bees, including species that are rare and that are common. However, rare species appeared to respond differently than typical species, and depending on how species were classified as rare, could display muted or even negative responses to habitat enhancement. Targeting rare species with specific floral resources or unique habitat types may lead to better outcomes for rare and threatened species. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Are plants in sown flower strips suitable for communities of wild bees? Pollination network approach in conservation biology 96%
- Pollinators differentially respond to local and landscape grassland features 96%
- Five years of citizen science and standardized field surveys reveal a threatened urban Eden for wild bees in Brussels, Belgium 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Contrasting effects of land cover on nesting habitat use and reproductive output for bumble bees 95%
- Chilean bee diversity: Contrasting patterns of species and phylogenetic turnover along a large-scale ecological gradient 94%
- The effects of experimental floral resource removal on plant-pollinator interactions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Plant provenance affects pollinator network: implications for ecological restoration 93%
- City climate and landscape structure shape pollinators, nectar and transported pollen along a gradient of urbanization 93%
- A globally influential area-condition metric is a poor proxy for invertebrate biodiversity 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fine-Scale Models of Bee Species Diversity and Habitat in New York State 96%
- Plant-pollinator interactions in apple orchards from a production and conservation perspective 93%
- A framework for linking hemispheric, full annual cycle prioritizations to local conservation actions for migratory birds 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integration of an invasive plant in hummingbird and flower mite networks is driven by ecological fitting and generalization 94%
- Agriculturally developed areas reduce genetic connectivity for a keystone neotropical ungulate 92%
- Hurricane-induced population decrease in a Critically Endangered long-lived reptile 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.