Back

Alpha oscillatory activity causally linked to working memory retention: insights from online phase-locking closed-loop transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)

Chen, X.; Ma, R.; Zhang, W.; Wu, Q.; Yimiti, A.; Xia, X.; Cui, J.; Zeng, G. Q.; Bu, J.; Chen, Q.; Yu, N. X.; Wang, S.; Deng, Z.-D.; Sack, A. T.; Laughlin, M. M.; Zhang, X.

2021-05-23 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.05.23.445322 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Although previous studies have reported correlations between alpha oscillations and the "retention" sub-process of working memory (WM), causal evidence has been limited in human neuroscience due to the lack of delicate modulation of human brain. Conventional tACS is not suitable for demonstrating the causal evidence for parietal alpha oscillations in WM retention because of its inability to modulate brain oscillations within a short period (i.e., the retention sub-process). Here, we developed an online phase-corrected closed-loop transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) system capable of precisely correcting for the phase differences between tACS and concurrent endogenous oscillations. This system permits both up- and down-regulation of brain oscillations at the target stimulation frequency within a short stimulation period, and is here applied to empirically demonstrate that parietal alpha oscillations causally relate to WM retention. Our experimental design included both in-phase and anti-phase alpha-tACS applied to 39 participants during the retention sub-processes of a modified Sternberg paradigm. Compared to in-phase alpha-tACS, anti-phase alpha-tACS decreased both WM performance and alpha activity. Moreover, the in-phase tACS-induced changes in WM performance were positively correlated with alpha oscillatory activity. These findings strongly support a causal link between alpha oscillations and WM retention, and illustrate the broad application prospects of phase-corrected tACS.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.