Quantitative susceptibility mapping captures chronic multiple sclerosis rim lesions with greater myelin damage: Comparison with high-pass filtered phase MRI
Huang, W.; Sweeney, E. M.; Kaunzner, U. W.; Wang, Y.; Gauthier, S. A.; Nguyen, T. D.
Show abstract
BackgroundChronic active MS lesions with paramagnetic rim can be identified by high-pass filtered (HPF) phase imaging or quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). PurposeThe objective was to compare the ability of HPF and QSM to identify MS lesions with greater myelin damage and to distinguish MS patients with increased clinical disability. Material and MethodsEighty-six patients were scanned with gradient echo sequence for lesion rim detection and FAST-T2 sequence for myelin water fraction (MWF) mapping. Chronic lesions were classified based on the presence/absence of rim on HPF and QSM images (HPF rim+/QSM rim+, HPF rim+/QSM rim-, HPF rim-/QSM rim+, HPF rim-/QSM rim-). A lesion-level linear mixed-effects model with MWF as outcome was used to compare myelin damage among the lesion groups. A multivariate patient-level linear regression model was fit to establish the association between Expanded Disease Status Scale (EDSS) and the number of rim lesions (zero vs. one or more). ResultsOf 2229 lesions, 96 (8.8%) were HPF rim+/QSM rim+, 211 (9.5%) were HPF rim+/QSM rim-, and the remainder had no rim. Adjusting for other factors, HPF rim+/QSM rim+ lesions had on average significantly lower MWF than both HPF rim+/QSM rim-(p<0.001) and HPF rim-/QSM rim-(p<0.001) lesions, while the MWF difference between HPF rim+/QSM rim- and HPF rim-/QSM rim-lesions was not statistically significant (p=0.309). Having at least one QSM rim+ lesion was associated with an increase in EDSS compared to having no QSM rim+ lesions, holding all other factors constant (p=0.026). The relationship between having one or more HPF rim+ lesions vs. having no HPF rim+ lesions and EDSS was not statistically significant. ConclusionQSM identifies chronic MS lesions with paramagnetic rim that on average have greater myelin damage. QSM may be a valuable tool for studying the impact of rim lesions on clinical disability in MS.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Portable, Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sensitively Detects and Accurately Quantifies Multiple Sclerosis Lesions 97%
- Fully Automated Detection of Paramagnetic Rims in Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on 3T Susceptibility-Based MR Imaging 96%
- Magnetisation transfer, diffusion and g-ratio measures of demyelination and neurodegeneration in early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal microstructural MRI study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- AI-powered Gradient Echo Plural Contrast Imaging (AI-GEPCI): a Comprehensive Multiparametric Neurological Protocol from a Single MRI Scan 93%
- Test-retest reproducibility of in vivo magnetization transfer ratio and saturation index in mice at 9.4 Tesla 92%
- 'Pscore' - A Novel Percentile-Based Metric to Accurately Assess Individual Deviations in Non-Gaussian Distributions of Quantitative MRI Metrics 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Glymphatic dysfunction in multiple sclerosis and its association with disease pathology and disability 97%
- Paramagnetic rim lesions are associated with pathogenic CSF profiles and worse clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective cross-sectional study 97%
- Tissue damage detected by quantitative gradient echo MRI correlates with clinical progression in non-relapsing progressive MS 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain predictors of fatigue in Rheumatoid Arthritis: a machine learning study 93%
- Differentiation of white matter histopathology using b-tensor encoding and machine learning 92%
- Brain connectivity changes underlying depression and fatigue in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.