Neural Representations of Task-relevant and Task-irrelevant Features of Attended Objects
Chen, J.; Scotti, P. S.; Dowd, E. W.; Golomb, J. D.
Show abstract
Visual attention plays an essential role in selecting task-relevant and ignoring task-irrelevant information, for both object features and their locations. In the real world, multiple objects with multiple features are often simultaneously present in a scene. When spatial attention selects an object, how are the task-relevant and task-irrelevant features represented in the brain? Previous literature has shown conflicting results on whether and how irrelevant features are represented in visual cortex. In an fMRI task, we used a modified inverted encoding model (IEM, e.g., Sprague & Serences, 2015) to test whether we can reconstruct the task-relevant and task-irrelevant features of spatially attended objects in a multi-feature (color + orientation), multi-item display. Subjects were briefly shown an array of three colored, oriented gratings. Subjects were instructed as to which feature (color or orientation) was relevant before each block, and on each trial were asked to report the task-relevant feature of the object that appeared at a spatially pre-cued location, using a continuous color or orientation wheel. By applying the IEM, we achieved reliable feature reconstructions for the task-relevant features of the attended object from visual ROIs (V1 and V4v) and Intraparietal sulcus. Preliminary searchlight analyses showed that task-irrelevant features of attended objects could be reconstructed from activity in some intraparietal areas, but the reconstructions were much weaker and less reliable compared with task-relevant features. These results suggest that both relevant and irrelevant features may be represented in visual and parietal cortex but in different forms. Our method provides potential tools to noninvasively measure unattended feature representations and probe the extent to which spatial attention acts as a "glue" to bind task-relevant and task-irrelevant features.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Dissociating the neural correlates of subjective visibility from those of decision confidence 98%
- Predicting identity-preserving object transformations across the human ventral visual stream 97%
- Feedback scales the spatial tuning of cortical responses during both visual working memory and long-term memory 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial and temporal context jointly modulate the sensory response within the ventral visual stream 98%
- Abstract neural representations of category membership beyond information coding stimulus or response 97%
- Spatial predictive context speeds up visual search by biasing local attentional competition 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- The locus of recognition memory signals in human cortex depends on the complexity of the memory representations 97%
- Statistical learning of frequent distractor locations in visual search involves regional signal suppression in early visual cortex 97%
- Strategic control of location and ordinal context in visual working memory 97%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.