Colchicine in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial
Horby, P. W.; Campbell, M.; Spata, E.; Emberson, J. R.; Staplin, N.; Pessoa-Amorim, G.; Peto, L.; Wiselka, M.; Wiffen, L.; Tiberi, S.; Caplin, B.; Wroe, C.; Green, C.; Hine, P.; Prudon, B.; George, T.; Wight, A.; Baillie, J. K.; Basnyat, B.; Buch, M. H.; Chappell, L. C.; Day, J. N.; Faust, S. N.; Hamers, R. L.; Jaki, T.; Juszczak, E.; Jeffery, K.; Lim, W. S.; Montgomery, A.; Mumford, A.; Rowan, K.; Thwaites, G.; Mafham, M.; Haynes, R.; Landray, M. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundColchicine has been proposed as a treatment for COVID-19 on the basis of its anti-inflammatory actions. MethodsIn this randomised, controlled, open-label trial, several possible treatments were compared with usual care in patients hospitalised with COVID-19. Eligible and consenting adults were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either usual standard of care alone or usual standard of care plus colchicine twice daily for 10 days or until discharge (or one of the other treatment arms) using web-based simple (unstratified) randomisation with allocation concealment. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. The trial is registered with ISRCTN (50189673) and clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04381936). FindingsBetween 27 November 2020 and 4 March 2021, 5610 patients were randomly allocated to receive colchicine and 5730 patients to receive usual care alone. Overall, 1173 (21%) patients allocated to colchicine and 1190 (21%) patients allocated to usual care died within 28 days (rate ratio 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-1.10; p=0.77). Consistent results were seen in all pre-specified subgroups of patients. There was no significant difference in duration of hospitalisation (median 10 days vs. 10 days) or the proportion of patients discharged from hospital alive within 28 days (70% vs. 70%; rate ratio 0.98; 95% CI 0.94-1.03; p=0.44). Among those not on invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline, there was no significant difference in the proportion meeting the composite endpoint of invasive mechanical ventilation or death (25% vs. 25%; risk ratio 1.02; 95% CI 0.96-1.09; p=0.47). InterpretationIn adults hospitalised with COVID-19, colchicine was not associated with reductions in 28-day mortality, duration of hospital stay, or risk of progressing to invasive mechanical ventilation or death. FundingUK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council) and National Institute of Health Research (Grant ref: MC_PC_19056). Wellcome Trust (Grant Ref: 222406/Z/20/Z) through the COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Namilumab or infliximab compared to standard of care in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (CATALYST): a phase 2 randomised adaptive trial 98%
- A randomised clinical trial of azithromycin versus standard care in ambulatory COVID-19 – the ATOMIC2 trial 97%
- Inhaled budesonide in the treatment of early COVID-19 illness: a randomised controlled trial 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of Rosuvastatin plus Colchicine, Emtricitabine/Tenofovir and a combination of them in Hospitalized Patients with SARS Covid-19 96%
- The angiotensin type 2 receptor agonist C21 restores respiratory function in COVID19 - a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial 96%
- Early treatment with nitazoxanide prevents worsening of mild and moderate COVID-19 and subsequent hospitalization 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antivirals for post-exposure prophylaxis of influenza: a systematic review and network meta-analysis 93%
- Real-world effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir against mortality, hospitalization, and in-hospital outcomes among community-dwelling, ambulatory COVID-19 patients during the BA.2.2 wave in Hong Kong: an observational study 92%
- Antivirals for treatment of severe influenza: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- CATALYST trial protocol: A multicentre, open-label, phase II, multi-arm trial for an early and accelerated evaluation of the potential treatments for COVID-19 in hospitalised adults 95%
- Adverse effects of remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, and lopinavir/ritonavir when used for COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials 94%
- The DEXACELL Trial; a protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, parallel group, phase 3 superiority trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of DEXAmethasone as an adjunctive therapy for the management of CELLulitis in adults presenting to urgent secondary care in the UK 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.