Back

Error minimization and specificity could emerge in a genetic code as by-products ofprebiotic evolution

Janzen, E.; Shen, Y.; Liu, Z.; Blanco, C.; Chen, I. A.

2021-05-17 biochemistry
10.1101/2021.05.14.444235 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The emergence of the genetic code was a major transition in the evolution from a prebiotic RNA world to the earliest modern cells1. A prominent feature of the standard genetic code is error minimization, or the tendency of mutations to be unusually conservative in preserving biophysical features of the amino acid2-6. While error minimization is often assumed to result from natural selection, it has also been speculated that error minimization may be a by-product of emergence of the genetic code3. During establishment of the genetic code in an RNA world, self-aminoacylating ribozymes would enforce the mapping of amino acids to anticodons. Here we show that expansion of the genetic code, through co-option of ribozymes for new substrates, could result in error minimization as an emergent property. Using self-aminoacylating ribozymes previously identified during an exhaustive search of sequence space7, we measured the activity of thousands of candidate ribozymes on alternative substrates (activated analogs for tryptophan, phenylalanine, leucine, isoleucine, valine, and methionine). Related ribozymes exhibited preferences for biophysically similar substrates, indicating that co-option of existing ribozymes to adopt additional amino acids into the genetic code would itself lead to error minimization. Furthermore, ribozyme activity was positively correlated with specificity, indicating that selection for increased activity would also lead to increased specificity. These results demonstrate that by-products of the evolution and functional expansion of a ribozyme system could lead to adaptive properties of a genetic code. Such spandrels could thus underlie significant prebiotic developments.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.