Back

Dissection of N-, O- and glycosphingolipid glycosylation changes in PaTu-S pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells upon TGF-β challenge

Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Holst, S.; BlÖchl, C.; Madunic, K.; Wuhrer, M.; ten Dijke, P.; Zhang, T.

2021-05-17 cancer biology
10.1101/2021.05.14.444203 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by poor prognosis and high mortality. Transforming growth factor-{beta} (TGF-{beta}) plays a key role in tumor progression, which is often associated with aberrant glycosylation. How PDAC cells respond to TGF-{beta} and the role of glycosylation therein is, however, not well known. Here, we investigated the TGF-{beta}-mediated response and glycosylation changes in SMAD4-deficient PaTu-8955S (PaTu-S) cell line. PaTu-S cells responded to TGF-{beta} by upregulating SMAD2 phosphorylation and target gene expression. TGF-{beta} induced expression of the mesenchymal marker N-cadherin, but did not significantly affect epithelial marker E-cadherin expression. The differences of N-glycans, O-glycans and glycosphingolipid (GSL) glycans in PaTu-S cells with TGF-{beta} stimulation were examined. TGF-{beta} treatment primarily induced N-glycome aberrations involving elevated levels of branching, core fucosylation, and sialylation in PaTu-S cells, in line with TGF-{beta}-induced changes in the expression of glycosylation-related genes. In addition, we observed differences in O- and GSL-glycosylation profiles after TGF-{beta} treatment, including lower levels of sialylated Tn antigen, and neoexpression of globosides. Furthermore, SOX4 expression was upregulated upon TGF-{beta} stimulation, and its depletion blocked the TGF-{beta}-induced N-glycomic changes. Thus, our study provides a mechanism by which TGF-{beta}-induced N-glycosylation changes in SOX4 dependent and SMAD4 independent manner in pancreatic cancer cells. Our results open up avenues to study the relevance of glycosylation in TGF-{beta} signaling in SMAD4 inactivated PDAC.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.