iSubGen: Integrative Subtype Generation by Pairwise Similarity Assessment
Fox, N. S.; Li, C. H.; Haider, S.; Boutros, P. C.
Show abstract
There are myriad types of biomedical data- genetics, transcriptomics, clinical, imaging, wearable devices and many more. When a group of patients with the same underlying disease exhibit similarities across multiple types of data, this is called a subtype. Disease subtypes can reflect etiology and sometimes predict clinical behaviour. Existing subtyping approaches struggle to simultaneously handle multiple diverse data types, particularly when there is missing information, as is common in most real-world clinical datasets. To improve subtype discovery, we exploited changes in the correlation-structure between different data types to create iSubGen, an algorithm for integrative subtype generation. iSubGen can combine arbitrary data types for subtype discovery, such as merging molecular, mutational signature, pathway and micro-environmental data. iSubGen recapitulates known subtypes across multiple diseases, even in the face of substantial missing data. It identifies groups of patients with divergent clinical outcomes, and can combine arbitrary data types for subtype discovery, such as merging molecular, mutational signature, pathway and micro-environmental data. iSubGen can accommodate any feature that can be compared with a similarity-metric, and provides a versatile approach for creating subtypes. It is available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=iSubGen.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- RNA allelic frequencies of somatic mutations encode substantial functional information in cancers 97%
- Disruption of metazoan gene regulatory networks in cancer alters the balance of co-expression between genes of unicellular and multicellular origins 96%
- An integrated single-cell RNA-seq map of human neuroblastoma tumors and preclinical models uncovers divergent mesenchymal-like gene expression programs. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.