Back

REACT-1 round 11 report: low prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the community prior to the third step of the English roadmap out of lockdown

Riley, S.; Haw, D. J.; Walters, C. E.; Wang, H.; Eales, O.; Ainslie, K. E. C.; Atchison, C.; Fronterre, C.; Diggle, P. J.; Page, A. J.; Trotter, A. J.; Le Viet, T.; Alikhan, N.-F.; O'Grady, J.; The COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) Consortium, ; Ashby, D.; Donnelly, C.; Cooke, G.; Barclay, W.; Ward, H.; Darzi, A.; Elliott, P.

2021-05-17 epidemiology
10.1101/2021.05.13.21257144 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundNational epidemic dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 infections are being driven by: the degree of recent indoor mixing (both social and workplace), vaccine coverage, intrinsic properties of the circulating lineages, and prior history of infection (via natural immunity). In England, infections, hospitalisations and deaths fell during the first two steps of the "roadmap" for exiting the third national lockdown. The third step of the roadmap in England takes place on 17 May 2021. MethodsWe report the most recent findings on community infections from the REal-time Assessment of Community Transmission-1 (REACT-1) study in which a swab is obtained from a representative cross-sectional sample of the population in England and tested using PCR. Round 11 of REACT-1 commenced self-administered swab-collection on 15 April 2021 and completed collections on 3 May 2021. We compare the results of REACT-1 round 11 to round 10, in which swabs were collected from 11 to 30 March 2021. ResultsBetween rounds 10 and 11, prevalence of swab-positivity dropped by 50% in England from 0.20% (0.17%, 0.23%) to 0.10% (0.08%, 0.13%), with a corresponding R estimate of 0.90 (0.87, 0.94). Rates of swab-positivity fell in the 55 to 64 year old group from 0.17% (0.12%, 0.25%) in round 10 to 0.06% (0.04%, 0.11%) in round 11. Prevalence in round 11 was higher in the 25 to 34 year old group at 0.21% (0.12%, 0.38%) than in the 55 to 64 year olds and also higher in participants of Asian ethnicity at 0.31% (0.16%, 0.60%) compared with white participants at 0.09% (0.07%, 0.11%). Based on sequence data for positive samples for which a lineage could be identified, we estimate that 92.3% (75.9%, 97.9%, n=24) of infections were from the B.1.1.7 lineage compared to 7.7% (2.1%, 24.1%, n=2) from the B.1.617.2 lineage. Both samples from the B.1.617.2 lineage were detected in London from participants not reporting travel in the previous two weeks. Also, allowing for suitable lag periods, the prior close alignment between prevalence of infections and hospitalisations and deaths nationally has diverged. DiscussionWe observed marked reductions in prevalence from March to April and early May 2021 in England reflecting the success of the vaccination programme and despite easing of restrictions during lockdown. However, there is potential upwards pressure on prevalence from the further easing of lockdown regulations and presence of the B.1.617.2 lineage. If prevalence rises in the coming weeks, policy-makers will need to assess the possible impact on hospitalisations and deaths. In addition, consideration should be given to other health and economic impacts if increased levels of community transmission occur.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
3
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 8%
3.7%
6
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
9
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.9%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
11
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
19
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
23
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.7%
28
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.7%
29
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%