Back

MiR-139-5p is a causal biomarker for type 2 diabetes; Results from genome-wide microRNA profiling and Mendelian randomization analysis in a population-based study

Mens, M. M. J.; Mustafa, R.; Ahmadizar, F.; Ikram, M. A.; Evangelou, M.; Kavousi, M.; Dehghan, A.; Ghanbari, M.

2021-05-17 epidemiology
10.1101/2021.05.13.21257090 medRxiv
Show abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as key regulators of gene expression. Differential expression of miRNAs has been linked to diabetes, but underlying pathways remain poorly understood. We performed genome-wide miRNAs profiling and tested the causal associations between miRNAs and type 2 diabetes in the general population. Subsequently, we investigated target genes and metabolites of miRNAs to provide insight into the metabolic disturbances that emerge with type 2 diabetes. Between 2002 and 2005, plasma levels of 2083 circulatory miRNAs were profiled in 1900 participants (mean age 71.4 years) of the population-based Rotterdam Study cohort. The associations of 591 well-expressed miRNAs with prevalent and incident type 2 diabetes were examined until 2015. Two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) was conducted to investigate the causal associations and miRNA-target genes and metabolites were studied in relation to type 2 diabetes. At baseline, higher plasma levels of miR-139-5p and miR-193a-5p were associated (FDR<0.05) with prevalent type 2 diabetes (n=253 cases). During a follow-up of >9.0 years, 209 participants developed type 2 diabetes. Plasma levels of miR-99a-5p, miR-4664-3p, miR-29a-3p, miR-122-5p, and miR-125b-5p were significantly associated with incident type 2 diabetes (n=209). Two-sample MR confirmed a causal effect for miR-139-5p (MR-IWV-beta=0.10, p=3.51x10-4) on type 2 diabetes. We found several target genes and metabolites that could link miR-139-5p to pathways underlying type 2 diabetes. Our study indicates a causal relationship between miR-139-5p and type 2 diabetes and suggests this miRNA as a plasma biomarker of type 2 diabetes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.