Patterns of Multimorbidity
Siah, K. W.; Wong, C. H.; Gupta, J.; Lo, A. W.
Show abstract
BackgroundWith multimorbidity becoming the norm rather than the exception, the management of multiple chronic diseases is a major challenge facing healthcare systems worldwide. MethodsUsing a large, nationally representative database of electronic medical records from the United Kingdom spanning the years 2005 to 2016 and consisting over 4.5 million patients, we apply statistical methods and network analysis to identify comorbid pairs and triads of diseases and identify clusters of chronic conditions across different demographic groups. Unlike many previous studies, which generally adopt cross-sectional designs, we examine temporal changes in the patterns of multimorbidity. In addition, we perform survival analysis to examine the impact of multimorbidity on mortality. ResultsThe proportion of the population with multimorbidity has increased by approximately 2.5 percentage points over the last decade, with more than 17% having at least two chronic morbidities. We find that the prevalence and the severity of multimorbidity increase progressively with age. Stratifying by socioeconomic status, we find that people living in more deprived areas are more likely to be multimorbid compared to those living in more affluent areas at all ages. The same trend holds consistently for all years in our data. In addition to a number of strongly associated comorbid pairs (e.g., cardiac-vascular and cardiac-metabolic disorders), we identify three principal clusters: a respiratory cluster, a cardiovascular cluster, and a mixed cardiovascular-renal-metabolic cluster. These are supported by established pathophysiological mechanisms and shared risk factors, and are largely consistent with existing studies in the medical literature. ConclusionsIn this paper, we use data-driven methods to characterize multimorbidity patterns in different demographic groups and their evolution over the past decade. Our findings contribute to the better understanding of the epidemiology of multimorbidity that is needed to develop more effective primary care for multimorbid patients.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying clusters of people with Multiple Long-Term Conditions using Large Language Models: a population-based study 95%
- Continuous-Time and Dynamic Suicide Attempt Risk Prediction with Neural Ordinary Differential Equations 94%
- Novel clinical subphenotypes in COVID-19: derivation, validation, prediction, temporal patterns, and interaction with social determinants of health 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating excess mortality in people with cancer and multimorbidity in the COVID-19 emergency 93%
- Identifying markers of health-seeking behaviour and healthcare access in UK electronic health records 91%
- Inequalities in healthcare disruptions during the Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from 12 UK population-based longitudinal studies 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Pretrained Patient Trajectories for Adverse Drug Event Prediction Using Common Data Model-based Electronic Health Records 92%
- The Interpretable Multimodal Machine Learning (IMML) framework reveals pathological signatures of distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy 91%
- Subpopulation-specific Machine Learning Prognosis for Underrepresented Patients with Double Prioritized Bias Correction 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.