Back

Chlorophyll fluorescence: How the quality of information about PAM instrument parameters may affect our research

Nies, T.; Niu, Y.; Ebenhöh, O.; Matsubara, S.; Matuszynska, A.

2021-05-13 plant biology Community evaluation
10.1101/2021.05.12.443801 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chlorophyll a fluorescence is a powerful indicator of photosynthetic energy conversion in plants and photosynthetic microorganisms. One of the most widely used measurement techniques is Pulse Amplitude Modulation (PAM) fluorometry. Unfortunately, parameter settings of PAM instruments are often not completely described in scientific articles although their variations, however small these may seem, can influence measurements. We show the effects of parameter settings on PAM measurements. We first simulated fluorescence signals using a previously published computational model of photosynthesis. Then, we validated our findings experimentally. Our analysis demonstrates how the kinetics of non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) induction and relaxation are affected by different settings of PAM instrument parameters. Neglecting these parameters may mislead data interpretation and derived hypotheses, hamper independent validation of the results, and cause problems for mathematical formulation of underlying processes. Given the uncertainties inflicted by this neglect, we urge PAM users to provide detailed documentation of measurement protocols. Moreover, to ensure accessibility to the required information, we advocate minimum information standards that can serve both experimental and computational biologists in our efforts to advance system-wide understanding of biological processes. Such specification will enable launching a standardized database for plant and data science communities. HighlightPAM fluorometry measurement is sensitive to instrument settings and protocols. Yet, protocols are published incompletely. We urge to reach an agreement on minimal protocol information of PAM experiments to be shared publicly.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Photosynthesis Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.3%
3
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.3%
4
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
5
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
7
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
9
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
10
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
12
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.3%
13
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
15
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
18
Algal Research
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
20
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
22
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
24
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
26
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
28
HardwareX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Environmental and Experimental Botany
11 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%