Viral shedding and transmission after natural infection and vaccination in an animal model of SARS-CoV-2 propagation
Zeiss, C. J.; Asher, J. L.; Vander Wyk, B. J.; Allore, H. G.; Compton, S. J.
Show abstract
At present, global immunity to SARS-CoV-2 resides within a heterogeneous combination of susceptible, naturally infected and vaccinated individuals. The extent to which viral shedding and transmission occurs on re-exposure to SARS-CoV-2 after prior natural exposure or vaccination is an emerging area of understanding. We used Sialodacryoadenitis Virus (SDAV) in rats to model the extent to which immune protection afforded by prior natural infection via high risk (inoculation; direct contact) or low risk (fomite) exposure, or by vaccination, influenced viral shedding and transmission on re-exposure. On initial infection, we confirmed that amount, duration and consistency of viral shedding were correlated with exposure risk. Animals were reinfected after 3.7-5.5 months using the same exposure paradigm. Amount and duration of viral shedding were correlated with re-exposure type and serologic status. 59% of seropositive animals shed virus. Previously exposed seropositive reinfected animals were able to transmit virus to 25% of naive recipient rats after 24-hour exposure by direct contact. Rats vaccinated intranasally with a related virus (Parkers Rat Coronavirus) were able to transmit SDAV to only 4.7% of naive animals after a 7-day direct contact exposure, despite comparable viral shedding. Observed cycle threshold values associated with transmission in both groups ranged from 29-36 cycles, however observed shedding was not a prerequisite for transmission. Results indicate that low-level shedding in both naturally infected and vaccinated seropositive animals can propagate infection in susceptible individuals. Extrapolated to COVID-19, our results suggest that continued propagation of SARS-CoV-2 by seropositive previously infected or vaccinated individuals is possible.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Susceptibility of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) to SARS-CoV-2 93%
- Transmission and protection against re-infection in the ferret model with the SARS-CoV-2 USA-WA1/2020 reference isolate 93%
- The SARS-CoV-2 Spike is a virulence determinant and plays a major role on the attenuated phenotype of Omicron virus in a feline model of infection 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Age and infectious dose significantly affect disease progression after RHDV2 infection in naive domestic rabbits 93%
- Single amino acid mutations effect Zika virus replication in vitro and virulence in vivo 93%
- Time dependent proinflammatory responses shape virus interference during coinfections of influenza A virus and influenza D virus 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-term persistence of viral RNA and inflammation in the CNS of macaques exposed to aerosolized Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus. 94%
- The B.1.427/1.429 (epsilon) SARS-CoV-2 variants are more virulent than ancestral B.1 (614G) in Syrian hamsters 94%
- From Deer-to-Deer: SARS-CoV-2 is efficiently transmitted and presents broad tissue tropism and replication sites in white-tailed deer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 infection of Syrian hamster does not cause more severe disease and is protected by naturally acquired immunity 93%
- Sustained replication of synthetic canine distemper virus defective genomes in vitro and in vivo 92%
- SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in lions, tigers and hyenas at Denver Zoo 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Robustness of the ferret model for influenza risk assessment studies: a cross-laboratory exercise 94%
- Production of Noncapped Genomic RNAs is Critical to Sindbis Virus Disease and Pathogenicity 92%
- Engineering a mouse-adapted SADS-CoV and establishing a neonatal mouse model to study its infection 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.