Back

Deep learning generates custom-made logistic regression models for explaining how breast cancer subtypes are classified

Shibahara, T.; Wada, C.; Yamashita, Y.; Fujita, K.; Sato, M.; Okamoto, A.; Ono, Y.

2021-05-11 cancer biology
10.1101/2021.05.10.443518 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Differentiating the intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer is crucial for deciding the best treatment strategy. Deep learning can predict the subtypes from genetic information more accurately than conventional statistical methods, but to date, deep learning has not been directly utilized to examine which genes are associated with which subtypes. To clarify the mechanisms embedded in the intrinsic subtypes, we developed an explainable deep learning model called a point-wise linear (PWL) model that generates a custom-made logistic regression for each patient. Logistic regression, which is familiar to both physicians and medical informatics researchers, allows us to analyze the importance of the feature variables, and the PWL model harnesses these practical abilities of logistic regression. In this study, we show that analyzing breast cancer subtypes is clinically beneficial for patients and one of the best ways to validate the capability of the PWL model. First, we trained the PWL model with RNA-seq data to predict PAM50 intrinsic subtypes and applied it to the 41/50 genes of PAM50 through the subtype prediction task. Second, we developed a deep enrichment analysis method to reveal the relationships between the PAM50 subtypes and the copy numbers of breast cancer. Our findings showed that the PWL model utilized genes relevant to the cell cycle-related pathways. These preliminary successes in breast cancer subtype analysis demonstrate the potential of our analysis strategy to clarify the mechanisms underlying breast cancer and improve overall clinical outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.0%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
4
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
6
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
7
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
9
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
12
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
Journal of Computational Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.1%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
21
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
26
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
28
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%