Back

Multi-omics characterization of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells for the identification of putative critical quality attributes

Maughon, T. S.; Shen, X.; Huang, D.; Michael, A. O. A.; Shockey, W. A.; Andrews, S. H.; McRae, J. M.; Platt, M. O.; Fernandez, F. M.; Edison, A. S.; Stice, S. L.; Marklein, R. A.

2021-05-11 bioengineering
10.1101/2021.05.10.440010 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have shown great promise in the field of regenerative medicine as many studies have shown that MSCs possess immunomodulatory function. Despite this promise, no MSC therapies have been granted licensure from the FDA. This lack of successful clinical translation is due in part to MSC heterogeneity and a lack of critical quality attributes (CQAs). While MSC Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygnease (IDO) activity has been shown to correlate with MSC function, multiple CQAs may be needed to better predict MSC function. MethodsThree MSC lines (two bone marrow, one iPSC) were expanded to three passages. At the time of harvest for each passage, cell pellets were collected for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and ultra-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS), and media was collected for cytokine profiling. Harvested cells were also cryopreserved for assessing function using T cell proliferation and IDO activity assays. Linear regression was performed on functional and multiomics data to reduce the number of important features, and partial least squares regression (PLSR) was used to obtain putative CQAs based on variable importance in projection (VIP) scores. ResultsSignificant functional heterogeneity (in terms of T cell suppression and IDO activity) was observed between the three MSC lines, as well as donor-dependent differences based on passage. Omics characterization revealed distinct differences between cell lines using principal component analysis (PCA). Cell lines separated along principal component 1 based on tissue source (bone marrow vs. iPSC-derived) for NMR, MS, and cytokine profiles. PLSR modeling of important features predicts MSC functional capacity with NMR (R2=0.86), MS (R2=0.83), cytokines (R2=0.70), and a combination of all features (R2=0.88). DiscussionThe work described here provides a platform for identifying putative CQAs for predicting MSC functional capacity using PLSR modeling that could be used as release criteria and guide future manufacturing strategies for MSCs and other cell therapies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.1%
2
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.0%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
6
Stem Cells
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
7
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
8
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
9
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
10
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
11
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
12
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
13
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Journal of Biological Engineering
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
16
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
18
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
22
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
25
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
Journal of Molecular Cell Biology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
29
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%