Re-evaluating rhythmic attentional switching: Spurious oscillations from shuffling-in-time
Brookshire, G.
Show abstract
How does attention help to focus perceptual processing on the important parts of a visual scene? Although the neural and perceptual effects of attention were traditionally assumed to be sustained over time, the field is converging on a dramatically different view: that covert attention rhythmically switches between objects at 3-8 Hz. Here I demonstrate that ubiquitous analyses in this literature conflate rhythmic oscillations with aperiodic temporal structure. Using computational simulations, I show that the behavioral oscillations reported in this literature could reflect aperiodic dynamics in attention, rather than periodic rhythms. I then propose two analyses (one novel and one widely used in climate science) that discriminate between periodic and aperiodic structure in behavioral time-series. Finally, I apply these alternative analyses to published data-sets, and find no evidence for rhythms in attentional switching after accounting for aperiodic temporal structure. Attention shows rich temporal structure. The techniques presented here will help to clarify the periodic and aperiodic dynamics of perception and cognition.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Adaptive oscillators provide a hard-coded Bayesian mechanism for rhythmic inference 96%
- Shape analysis of gamma rhythm supports a superlinear inhibitory regime in an inhibition-stabilized network 95%
- Information theoretic measures of neural and behavioural coupling predict representational drift 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gamma oscillations in primate primary visual cortex are severely attenuated by small stimulus discontinuities 92%
- Sustained neural rhythms reveal endogenous oscillations supporting speech perception 92%
- Feedback information sharing in the human brain reflects bistable perception in the absence of report 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.