Back

Superiority of serum NFL in predicting Multiple Sclerosis severity

Kosa, P.; Masvekar, R. R.; Komori, M.; Phillips, J.; Ramesh, V.; Varosanec, M.; Sandford, M.; Bielekova, B.

2021-05-10 neurology
10.1101/2021.05.07.21256836 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveSerum neurofilament light chain (sNFL) is becoming an important biomarker of neuroaxonal injury. While sNFL correlates with cerebrospinal fluid NFL (cNFL), 40-60% of variance remains unexplained. Assuming that for diseases of the central nervous system (CNS), such as multiple sclerosis (MS), the cNFL better reflects CNS injury, our goal was to develop and validate adjustment of sNFL for relevant confounders, to strengthen cNFL-sNFL correlations. MethodsWe used 1,378 matched cNFL-sNFL pairs divided into training and validation cohort with matching data on 11 confounders, neuroexam, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The effect of confounders on cNFL-sNFL relationship was tested using multiple linear regression (MLR) model. Propensity score matching was used to identify effect of spinal cord damage on sNFL levels. ResultsIn the training cohort (n=898) we correlated 11 confounders with the residuals from cNFL-sNFL linear regression. Four non-overlapping confounders explaining highest proportion of variance (12%: age, 8.7%: blood urea nitrogen, 3%: alkaline phosphatase, and 3.9%: weight) were used in MLR model. The model strengthened the cNFL-sNFL correlation from R2 = 0.52 to 0.64 in the independent validation cohort and strengthened correlation of adjusted sNFL with number of contrast-enhancing lesions (from R2 0.11 to 0.18). However, only sNFL, but not cNFL correlated with MS severity outcomes. Using propensity score matching, we demonstrated that subjects with proportionally higher sNFL to cNFL levels have significantly higher clinical and radiological evidence of spinal cord injury. InterpretationSuperiority of sNFL likely resides in the release of NFL from axons of lower motor or dorsal ganglia neurons directly to blood.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
Annals of Neurology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
4
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
5
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.8%
6
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
8
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
9
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
10
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
11
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
13
Neurobiology of Disease
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
15
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
16
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
89 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.1%
18
Journal of Neuroinflammation
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
European Journal of Neurology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
Molecular Neurobiology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.8%
23
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%