A novel protein signature from plasma extracellular vesicles for non-invasive differential diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Adduri, R. S.; Cai, K.; Alzate, K. V.; Vasireddy, R.; Miller, J. W.; Frias, S. P. d.; Frias, F. P. d.; Horimasu, Y.; Iwamoto, H.; Hattori, N.; Zhang, Y.; Gibson, K. F.; Pal, A. K.; Nicastro, D.; Li, L.; Cherian, S.; Sholl, L. M.; Schwartz, D. A.; Kass, D. J.; Rosas, I. O.; Konduru, N. V.
Show abstract
BackgroundIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fibrosing interstitial pneumonia of unknown etiology often leading to respiratory failure. Over half of IPF patients present with discordant features of usual interstitial pneumonia on high-resolution computed tomography at diagnosis which warrants surgical lung biopsy to exclude the possibility of other interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Therefore, there is a need for non-invasive biomarkers for expediting the differential diagnosis of IPF. MethodsUsing mass spectrometry, we performed proteomic analysis of plasma extracellular vesicles (EVs) in a cohort of subjects with IPF, chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, nonspecific interstitial pneumonitis, and healthy subjects (HS). A five-protein signature was identified by lasso regression and was validated in an independent cohort using ELISA. We evaluated the concordance between plasma EV proteome and the lung transcriptome data. Lastly, we compared the molecular pathways overrepresented in IPF by differentially expressed proteins and transcripts from EVs and lung tissues, respectively. ResultsThe five-protein signature derived from mass spectrometry data showed area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.915 (95%CI: 0.819-1.011) and 0.958 (95%CI: 0.882-1.034) for differentiating IPF from other ILDs and from HS, respectively. We also found that the EV protein expression profiles mirrored their corresponding mRNA expressions in IPF lungs. Further, we observed an overlap in the EV proteome- and lung mRNA-associated molecular pathways. ConclusionsWe discovered a plasma EV-based protein signature for differential diagnosis of IPF and validated this signature in an independent cohort. The signature needs to be tested in large prospective cohorts to establish its clinical utility.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiomic and quantitative label-free microscopy-based analysis of ex vivo culture and TGFbeta1 stimulation of human precision-cut lung slices 94%
- Single cell sequencing reveals cellular landscape alterations in the airway mucosa of patients with pulmonary long COVID 94%
- Pharmacological Inhibition of Epac1 Protects against Pulmonary Fibrosis by Blocking FoxO3a Neddylation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cytokine signaling converging on IL11 in ILD fibroblasts provokes aberrant epithelial differentiation signatures 94%
- Mass cytometry identifies characteristic immune cell subsets in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from interstitial lung diseases 94%
- Plasma gradient of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor is linked to pathogenic plasma proteome and immune transcriptome and stratifies outcomes in severe COVID-19 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeting ATP12A, a non-gastric proton pump alpha subunit, for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treatment 93%
- FK506-binding protein 13 expression is upregulated in interstitial lung disease and correlated with clinical severity: a potentially protective role. 93%
- Specialized Pro-Resolving Mediator loaded Extracellular Vesicles Mitigate Pulmonary Inflammation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sorted-Cell Proteomics Reveals an AT1-Associated Epithelial Cornification Phenotype and Suggests Endothelial Redox Imbalance in Human Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia 95%
- Elastin-derived peptides favor type 2 innate lymphoid cells in COPD 93%
- The lung extracellular matrix protein landscape in severe early-onset and moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.