Back

Topologically Associating Domain Boundaries are Commonly Required for Normal Genome Function

Rajderkar, S.; Barozzi, I.; Zhu, Y.; Hu, R.; Zhang, Y.; Li, B.; Fukuda-Yuzawa, Y.; Kelman, G.; Akeza, A.; Blow, M. J.; Pham, Q.; Harrington, A. N.; Godoy, J.; Meky, E. M.; von Maydell, K.; Novak, C. S.; Plajzer-Frick, I.; Afzal, V.; Tran, S.; Talkowski, M. E.; Llyod, K. C. K.; Ren, B.; Dickel, D. E.; Visel, A.; Pennacchio, L. A.

2021-05-07 genomics
10.1101/2021.05.06.443037 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Topologically associating domain (TAD) boundaries are thought to partition the genome into distinct regulatory territories. Anecdotal evidence suggests that their disruption may interfere with normal gene expression and cause disease phenotype1-3, but the overall extent to which this occurs remains unknown. Here we show that TAD boundary deletions commonly disrupt normal genome function in vivo. We used CRISPR genome editing in mice to individually delete eight TAD boundaries (11-80kb in size) from the genome in mice. All deletions examined resulted in at least one detectable molecular or organismal phenotype, which included altered chromatin interactions or gene expression, reduced viability, and anatomical phenotypes. For 5 of 8 (62%) loci examined, boundary deletions were associated with increased embryonic lethality or other developmental phenotypes. For example, a TAD boundary deletion near Smad3/Smad6 caused complete embryonic lethality, while a deletion near Tbx5/Lhx5 resulted in a severe lung malformation. Our findings demonstrate the importance of TAD boundary sequences for in vivo genome function and suggest that noncoding deletions affecting TAD boundaries should be carefully considered for potential pathogenicity in clinical genetics screening.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.0%
2
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.1%
3
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.8%
4
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
6
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
7
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
8
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.1%
9
Genes & Development
90 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
10
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Genetics in Medicine Open
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
14
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
15
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
16
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
17
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
20
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
22
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
23
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
25
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.6%
26
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%