Back

Meta-Analysis of Risk of Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia Following ChAdOx1-S Recombinant Vaccine

Chan, B. T. B.; Bobos, P.; Odutayo, A.; Pai, M.

2021-05-08 hematology
10.1101/2021.05.04.21256613
Show abstract

ContextVaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) has been reported after administering ChAdOx1-S recombinant COVID-19 vaccine (marketed as Vaxzevira by Astra-Zeneca, Covishield). Estimates of incidence vary between countries, due to different age distributions chosen, case definitions and choice of denominator (persons vaccinated vs immunizations given). This study clarifies these estimates by pooling data from ten countries and examining differences by age group. MethodsWe examined case reports, press releases and immunization data and calculated pooled estimates of VITT incidence using random effects models. Sensitivity analyses considered different combinations of countries and varying assumptions on time between vaccination and reporting of cases. ResultsPooling all countries, VITT incidence was 0.73 per 100,000 persons receiving first dose of Covishield/Vaxzevira [95% CI .43,1.23]. Incidence for age 65 and over was 0.11 per 100,000 persons [95% CI .05-.26], and significantly higher among those under age 55: 1.67 per 100,000 persons [95% CI 1.30-2.14] in the UK, 5.06 per 100,000 persons in Norway [95% CI 2.16, 11.86]. The latter had the best data on counts of persons vaccinated. Incidence for age 55 to 64 years was 0.34 [95% CI 0.13, 0.85] in the UK, lower than for under age 55. ConclusionVITT is a rare vaccine-associated adverse event. Incidence estimates vary between jurisdictions. However, even the highest reported incidence from Norway is low - and in settings with high community transmission, lower than risk of serious outcomes associated with Covid-19. Policymakers and individuals can use these data to calculate risk-benefit ratios and better target vaccine distribution. EssentialsO_LIThis paper measures risk of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) after ChAdOx1-S recombinant COVID-19 vaccine C_LIO_LIPooled estimates of incidence were calculated with a random effects model based on data from 10 countries C_LIO_LIOverall risk is 1 in 139,000; for age 65 and over, about 1 in 1,000,000; for age under 55, between 1 in 20,000 to 60,000 C_LIO_LIVITT risk is low and varies by age. These data can inform policies around vaccination distribution. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Haematology
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
16.1%
2
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
7.9%
3
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 1%
5.5%
4
BMJ
based on 49 papers
Top 0.9%
4.7%
5
Vaccines
based on 131 papers
Top 1%
4.7%
6
Vaccine
based on 140 papers
Top 2%
4.7%
7
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 76%
3.1%
8
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 7%
3.1%
9
Blood
based on 14 papers
Top 0.4%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
based on 10 papers
Top 0.3%
2.9%
11
Leukemia
based on 11 papers
Top 0.5%
2.9%
12
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 35%
2.4%
13
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
based on 57 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
14
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 8%
1.9%
15
Eurosurveillance
based on 77 papers
Top 4%
1.6%
16
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 11%
1.6%
17
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 30%
1.6%
18
New England Journal of Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
19
Public Health in Practice
based on 11 papers
Top 0.5%
1.4%
20
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 14%
1.4%
21
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
based on 14 papers
Top 0.6%
1.4%
22
Tropical Medicine & International Health
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
23
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 15%
1.2%
24
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
0.9%
25
European Journal of Neurology
based on 20 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 14%
0.8%
27
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
28
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 9%
0.8%
29
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
based on 16 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
30
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 20%
0.7%