Back

Predicting Environmental Chemical Carcinogenicity using a Hybrid Machine-Learning Approach

Limbu, S.; Dakshanamurthy, S.

2021-05-04 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2021.05.03.442477 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Determining environmental chemical carcinogenicity is an urgent need as humans are increasingly exposed to these chemicals. In this study, we determined the carcinogenicity of wide variety real-life exposure chemicals in large scale. To determine chemical carcinogenicity, we have developed carcinogenicity prediction models based on the hybrid neural network (HNN) architecture. In the HNN model, we included new SMILES feature representation method, by modifying our previous 3D array representation of 1D SMILES simulated by the convolutional neural network (CNN). We used 653 molecular descriptors modeled by feed forward neural network (FFNN), and SMILES as chemical features to train the models. We have developed three types of machine learning models: binary classification models to predict chemical is a carcinogenic or non-carcinogenic, multiclass classification models to predict severity of the chemical carcinogenicity, and regression models to predict median toxic dose of the chemicals. Along with the hybrid neural network (HNN) model that we developed, Random Forest (RF), Bootstrap Aggregating (Bagging) and Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost) methods were also used for binary and multiclass classification. Regression models were developed using HNN, RF, Support Vector Regressor (SVR), Gradient Boosting (GB), Kernel Ridge (KR), Decision Tree with AdaBoost (DT), KNeighbors (KN), and a consensus method. For binary classification, our HNN model predicted with an average accuracy of 74.33% and an average AUC of 0.806, for multiclass classification, the HNN model predicted with an average accuracy of 50.58% and an average micro-AUC of 0.68, and for regression model, the consensus method achieved R2 of 0.40. The predictive performance of our models based on a highly diverse chemicals is comparable to the literature reported models that included the similar and less diverse molecules. Our models can be used in identifying the potentially carcinogenic chemicals for a wide variety of chemical classes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Chemical Research in Toxicology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.7%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.8%
4
Toxicological Sciences
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
7
Chemosphere
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
Archives of Toxicology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
9
Journal of Hazardous Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
11
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
NeuroToxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Molecules
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
19
Journal of Cheminformatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
22
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
ACS ES&T Water
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Oncotarget
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Data in Brief
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
27
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
28
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%