Structures of the active HER2/HER3 receptor complex reveal dynamics at the dimerization interface induced by binding of a single ligand
Diwanji, D.; Trenker, R.; Thaker, T. M.; Wang, F.; Agard, D. A.; Verba, K. A.; Jura, N.
Show abstract
The Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) and HER3 form a potent pro-oncogenic heterocomplex upon binding of growth factor neuregulin-1{beta} (NRG1{beta})1-3. The mechanism by which HER2 and HER3 interact remains unknown in the absence of any structures of the complex. We isolated the NRG1{beta}-bound near full-length HER2/HER3 dimer and obtained a 2.9[A] cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) reconstruction of the extracellular domain module which reveals unexpected dynamics at the HER2/HER3 dimerization interface. We show that the dimerization arm of NRG1{beta}-bound HER3 is unresolved likely because the apo HER2 monomer fails to undergo a ligand-induced conformational change needed to establish a HER3 dimerization arm binding pocket. In a second structure of an oncogenic extracellular domain mutant of HER2, S310F, we observe a compensatory interaction with the HER3 dimerization arm that stabilizes the dimerization interface. We show that both HER2/HER3 and HER2-S310F/HER3 retain the capacity to bind to the HER2-directed therapeutic antibody, trastuzumab, but the mutant complex does not bind to pertuzumab. Our 3.5[A] structure of the HER2-S310F/HER3/NRG1{beta}/trastuzumab Fragment antigen binding (Fab) complex shows that the receptor dimer undergoes a conformational change to accommodate trastuzumab. Thus, like oncogenic mutations, therapeutics exploit the intrinsic dynamics of the HER2/HER3 heterodimer. The unique features of a singly liganded HER2/HER3 heterodimer underscore the allosteric sensing of the ligand occupancy by the dimerization interface and explain why extracellular domains of HER2 do not homo-associate via canonical active dimer interface.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.