A Meta-analysis of Mortality, Need for ICU admission, Use of Mechanical Ventilation and Adverse Effects with Ivermectin Use in COVID-19 Patients
Karale, S.; Bansal, V.; Makadia, J.; Tayyeb, M.; Khan, H.; Ghanta, S. S.; Singh, R.; Tekin, A.; Bhurwal, A.; Mutneja, H.; Mehra, I.; Kashyap, R.
Show abstract
ImportanceRepurposing Ivermectin, a known anti-parasitic agent, for treating COVID-19 has demonstrated positive results in several studies. We aim to evaluate the benefit and risk of Ivermectin in COVID-19. MethodsWe conducted a systematic search for full-text manuscripts published from February 1, 2020, to August 15th, 2021 focusing on Ivermectin therapy against COVID-19. The primary outcomes were mortality, need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission; secondary outcomes were - adverse effects, need for mechanical ventilation, viral clearance, time to viral clearance, need for hospitalization, and length of hospital stay. Random-effects models were used for all analyses. ResultsWe included a total of 52 studies (n=17561) in the qualitative analysis, out of these, 44 studies (n=14019) were included in the meta-analysis. In the mortality meta-analysis (N=29), odds of death were lower in the Ivermectin-arm compared to control (OR 0.54, p=0.009). Although lower odds of mortality were observed in various subgroup analyses of RCTs, they did not reach statistical significance: therapeutic RCTs: mild-moderate COVID-19 (OR 0.31, p=0.06), therapeutic RCTs: severe/critical COVID-19 (OR 0.86, p=0.56), inpatient RCTs: mild-moderate COVID-19 (OR 0.18, p=0.08), inpatient RCTs: severe/critical COVID-19 (OR 0.86, p=0.56). Ivermectin, mostly as adjuvant therapy, was associated with higher odds of viral clearance (N=22) (OR 3.52, p=0.0002), shorter duration to achieve viral clearance (N=8) (MD - 4.12, p=0.02), reduced need for hospitalization (N=6) (OR 0.34, p=008). ConclusionOur meta-analysis suggests that the mortality benefit of Ivermectin in COVID-19 is uncertain. But as adjuvant therapy, Ivermectin may improve viral clearance and reduce the need for hospitalization. HighlightsO_ST_ABSWhat We Already Know about This TopicC_ST_ABSO_LICOVID-19 is an ongoing global pandemic, for which Ivermectin has been tried on a therapeutic and prophylactic basis. C_LIO_LIResults from several clinical trials and observational studies suggest that Ivermectin may improve survival and clinical outcomes with a good safety profile when compared with other treatments; however, the current evidence is limited.. C_LI What This Article Tells Us That Is NewO_LIThis systematic review and meta-analysis provide a summary of the latest literature on the efficacy and safety of Ivermectin use for COVID-19. C_LIO_LIBased on our analysis of the latest evidence, we found that Ivermectins benefit in reducing mortality cannot be concluded with confidence. However, as an adjuvant therapy it may help reduce the need for hospitalization, duration for viral clearance while increasing the likelihood of achieving viral clearance. C_LIO_LIWe need more high-quality data for conclusive evidence regarding the benefit of Ivermectin in reducing the need for ICU admissions, mechanical ventilation and duration of hospital stay in COVID-19 patients. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse effects of remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, and lopinavir/ritonavir when used for COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials 96%
- Benefits and risks of zinc for adults during covid-19: rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials 94%
- Efficacy of remdesivir versus placebo for the treatment of COVID-19: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of Rosuvastatin plus Colchicine, Emtricitabine/Tenofovir and a combination of them in Hospitalized Patients with SARS Covid-19 94%
- Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent Group B streptococcal infections in newborn infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing various strategies 92%
- Neurological and psychiatric presentations associated with human monkeypox virus infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study of camostat mesilate (FOY-305) for the treatment of COVID-19 (CANDLE study) 93%
- Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials 92%
- Tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis (ROB-MEN): elaboration and examples 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hydroxychloroquine/Chloroquine for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis 93%
- Susceptibility and infectiousness of SARS-CoV-2 in children versus adults, by variant (wild-type, Alpha, Delta): a systematic review and meta-analysis of household contact studies 93%
- Protocol for the systematic review of the Pneumocystis jirovecii -associated pneumonia in non-HIV immunocompromised patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 therapeutics for low- and middle-income countries: a review of re-purposed candidate agents with potential for near-term use and impact 94%
- Design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of therapeutic efficacy studies in Visceral Leishmaniasis: A systematic review of published reports, 2000-2021 94%
- Early Treatment with Fluvoxamine Among Patients with COVID-19: A Cost-Consequence Model 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.