Back

Social steerability modulates perceptual biases

Anllo, H.; Watanabe, K.; Sackur, J.; de Gardelle, V.

2021-04-29 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.04.28.441710 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Verbal hints can bias perceptual decision-making, even when the information they provide is false. Whether individuals may be more or less susceptible to such perceptual influences, however, remains unclear. We asked naive participants to indicate the dominant color in a series of stimuli, after giving them a false statement about which color would likely dominate. As anticipated, this statement biased participants perception of the dominant color, as shown by a correlated shift of their perceptual decisions, confidence judgments and response times. Crucially, this perceptual bias was more pronounced in participants with higher levels of susceptibility to social influence, as measured by a standard suggestibility scale. Together, these results indicate that even without much apparatus, simple verbal hints can affect our perceptual reality, and that social steerability can determine how much they do so. Susceptibility to suggestion might thus be considered an integral part of perceptual processing. Statement of relevanceAt a time when fake news soar, understanding the role that simple verbal descriptions play in how we perceive the world around us is paramount. Extensive research has shown that perception is permeable to well-orchestrated manipulation. Comparatively less attention has been paid to the perceptual impact of false information when the latter is imparted simply and straightforwardly, through short verbal hints and instructions. Here we show that even a single sentence suffices to bias perceptual decision-making, and that critically, this bias varies across individuals as a function of susceptibility to social influence. Considering how here perception was biased by a single, plain sentence, we argue that researchers, communicators and policy-makers should pay careful attention to the role that social suggestibility plays in how we build our perceptual reality.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.9%
2
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.9%
6
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.1%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
9
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
12
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Psychological Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
14
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
16
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
18
Communications Psychology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
Psychological Review
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
21
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
22
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
23
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
25
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
27
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%