Back

The genomic basis of domestic colonisation and dispersal in Chagas disease vectors

Hernandez Castro, L. E.; Villacis, A. G.; Jacobs, A.; Cheaib, B.; Day, C. C.; Ocana-Mayorga, S.; Yumiseva, C. A.; Bacigalupo, A.; Andersson, B.; Matthews, L.; Landguth, E. L.; Costales, J. A.; Llewellyn, M. S.; Grijalva, M. J.

2021-04-27 genomics
10.1101/2021.04.27.441467 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The biology of vector adaptation to the human habitat remains poorly understood for many arthropod-borne diseases but underpins effective and sustainable disease control. We adopted a landscape genomics approach to investigate gene flow, signatures of local adaptation, and drivers of population structure among multiple linked wild and domestic population pairs in Rhodnius ecuadoriensis, an important vector of Chagas Disease. Evidence of high triatomine gene flow (FST) between wild and domestic ecotopes at sites throughout the study area indicate insecticide-based control will be hindered by constant re-infestation of houses. Genome scans revealed genetic loci with strong signal of local adaptation to the domestic setting, which we mapped to annotated regions in the Rhodnius prolixus genome. Our landscape genomic mixed effects models showed Rhodnius ecuadoriensis population structure and connectivity is driven by landscape elevation at a regional scale. Our ecologically- and spatially-explicit vector dispersal model enables targeted vector control and recommends spatially discrete, periodic interventions to local authorities as more efficacious than current, haphazard approaches. In tandem, evidence for parallel genomic adaptation to colonisation of the domestic environment at multiple sites sheds new light on the evolutionary basis of adaptation to the human host in arthropod vectors.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.