Back

Multi-Ancestry Meta-Analysis yields novel genetic discoveries and ancestry-specific associations

Turley, P.; Martin, A. R.; Goldman, G.; Li, H.; Kanai, M.; Walters, R. K.; Jala, J. B.; Lin, K.; Millwood, I. Y.; Carey, C. E.; Palmer, D. S.; Zacher, M.; Atkinson, E. G.; Chen, Z.; Li, L.; Akiyama, M.; Okada, Y.; Kamatani, Y.; Walters, R. G.; Callier, S.; Laibson, D.; Meyer, M. N.; Cesarini, D.; Daly, M.; Benjamin, D. J.; Neale, B. M.

2021-04-24 genomics
10.1101/2021.04.23.441003 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We present a new method, Multi-Ancestry Meta-Analysis (MAMA), which combines genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics from multiple populations to produce new summary statistics for each population, identifying novel loci that would not have been discovered in either set of GWAS summary statistics alone. In simulations, MAMA increases power with less bias and generally lower type-1 error rate than other multi-ancestry meta-analysis approaches. We apply MAMA to 23 phenotypes in East-Asian- and European-ancestry populations and find substantial gains in power. In an independent sample, novel genetic discoveries from MAMA replicate strongly.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.