Back

A Two-Component System FleS/FleR Regulates Multiple Virulence-Related Traits in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Zhou, T.; Huang, J.-h.; Feng, Q.-s.; Liu, Z.-q.; Lin, Q.-q.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, L.

2021-04-23 molecular biology
10.1101/2021.04.22.441042 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Microorganisms commonly use two-component systems (TCSs) to detect specific environmental changes and respond accordingly for their own benefit. However, the regulatory mechanisms and physiological roles of a majority of TCSs are still elusive. In this study, we focused on a previously predicted TCS FleS/FleR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa to systematically investigate its regulation and physiological roles. Loss of fleS or fleR or both genes led to decreased biofilm formation and attenuated motility in PAO1, which could be restored by heterologously complementation of FleR but not FleS, confirming that the sensor kinase FleS and the response regulator FleR constitute a TCS pair. To determine the regulatory spectrum of this TCS, we conducted transcriptome sequencing and comparison between the wild-type strain and the fleR deletion mutant. The result showed that the TCS regulates about 440 genes including most of them are involved in the virulence-related pathways, e.g. siderophore biosynthesis, pyocyanin biosynthesis, type III/VI secretion systems, c-di-GMP metabolism, flagellar assembly etc. In addition to its roles in controlling biofilm formation and motility we have already shown, FleR was demonstrated to regulate the production of virulence factors such as pyocyanin and elastase, mediate stress response to SDS, and autoregulate its own expression. Moreover, EMSA assays revealed that FleR regulates flagellum biosynthesis genes flgBCDE, flgFGHIJKL, filC, which are essential for the bacterial motility, by directly interacting with their promoters. Taken together, these results expanded our understanding on the biological roles of FleS/FleR and provided new insights on its regulatory mechanisms.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.