The genetics of assisted gene flow: immediate costs and long-term benefits
Grummer, J. A.; Booker, T. R.; Matthey-Doret, R.; Nietlisbach, P.; Thomaz, A. T.; Whitlock, M.
Show abstract
Plant and animal populations are facing several novel risks such as human-mediated habitat fragmentation and climate change that threaten their long-term productivity and persistence. With the genetic health of many populations deteriorating due to climate change outpacing physiological adaptation, human interventions in the form of assisted gene flow (AGF) may provide genetic variation to adapt populations to predicted climate change scenarios and result in more robust and productive populations. We ran genetic simulations to mimic a variety of AGF scenarios and measured their outcomes on population-level fitness to answer the question: in which circumstances is it worthwhile to perform AGF? Based on the parameters we explored, AGF may be harmful in certain situations over the short term (e.g., the first [~]10-20 generations), due to outbreeding depression and introducing deleterious genetic variation. Moreover, under many parameter sets, the benefits of AGF were relatively weak or took many generations to accrue. In general, when the adaptive trait is controlled by many loci of small effect, the benefits of assisted gene flow take much longer to realize-potentially too long for most climate-related management decisions. We also show that when translocation effort is divided across several generations and outbreeding depression is strong, the recipient population experiences a smaller decrease in fitness as compared to moving all individuals in a single effort. Importantly, in most cases, we show that the genomic integrity of the recipient population remains relatively intact following AGF; the amount of genetic material from the donor population typically ends up constituting no more of the recipient populations genome than the fraction introduced. Our results will be useful for conservation practitioners and silviculturists, for instance, aiming to intervene and adaptively manage so that populations maintain a robust genetic health and maintain productivity into the future given anthropogenic climate change.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Faster-haplodiploid evolution under divergence-with-gene-flow: simulations and empirical data from pine-feeding hymenopterans 96%
- Chromosomal inversions can limit adaptation to new environments 96%
- Genomic time-series data show that gene flow maintains high genetic diversity despite substantial genetic drift in a butterfly species 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic architecture influences when and how hybridization contributes to colonization 96%
- Hill-Robertson interference may bias the inference of fitness effects of new mutations in highly selfing species 96%
- Insights from Fisher's geometric model on the likelihood of speciation under different histories of environmental change 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.