Back

Genome-centric analyses of seasonal phyllosphere microbiome activities in perennial crops

Howe, A. C.; Stopnisek, N.; Dooley, S. K.; Yang, F. M.; Grady, K. L.; Shade, A.

2021-04-20 microbiology
10.1101/2021.04.20.440608 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plants and microorganisms form beneficial associations. Understanding plant-microbe interactions will inform microbiome management to enhance crop productivity and resilience to stress. Here, we apply a genome-centric approach to identify key leaf microbiome members on field-grown switchgrass and miscanthus, and quantify their activities for switchgrass over two growing seasons. We integrate metagenome and metatranscriptome sequencing from 192 leaf samples collected over key time points in crop phenology. We curated 40 focal metagenome-assembled-genomes (MAGs) and conservatively focus analysis on transcript recruitment to medium and high-quality MAGs that were <10% contaminated and >50% complete. Classes represented by these MAGs (Actinomycetia, Alpha- and Gamma-Proteobacteria, and Bacteroidota) were active and had seasonal dynamics in key functions, including enrichments in transcripts for of short chain dehydrogenase, molybdopterin oxioreductase, and polyketide cyclase in the late season. The majority of MAGs had activated stress-associated pathways, including trehalose metabolism, indole acetic acid degradation, betaine biosynthesis, and reactive oxygen species degradation, suggesting direct engagement with the host environment. We also detected seasonally activated biosynthetic pathways for terpenes (carotenoid and isoprenoids), and for various non-ribosomal peptide pathways that were poorly annotated. Overall, this study overcame laboratory and bioinformatic challenges associated with field-based leaf metatranscriptome analysis to inform potential key activities of these phyllosphere populations. These activities collectively support that leaf-associated bacterial populations are seasonally dynamic, responsive to host cues and interactively engage in feedbacks with the plant.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.