Back

Copy-number intratumor heterogeneity contributes to predict relapse in chemotherapy-naive stage II colon cancer

Lahoz, S.; Archilla, I.; Asensio, E.; Hernandez-Illan, E.; Ferrer, Q.; Lopez-Prades, S.; Nadeu, F.; Del Rey, J.; Sanz-Pamplona, R.; Lozano, J. J.; Castells, A.; Cuatrecasas, M.; Camps, J.

2021-04-17 genomics
10.1101/2021.04.16.440177 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Optimal selection of high-risk patients with stage II colon cancer is crucial to ensure clinical benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. Here, we investigate the prognostic and predictive value of genomic intratumor heterogeneity and aneuploidy for disease recurrence. We combined SNP arrays, targeted next-generation sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization and inmunohistochemistry on a retrospective cohort of 84 untreated stage II colon cancer patients. We assessed the subclonality of copy-number alterations (CNAs) and mutations, CD8+ lymphocyte infiltration and their association with time to recurrence (TTR). Prognostic factors were included in machine learning analysis to evaluate their ability to predict individual relapse risk. Tumors from recurrent patients (N = 38) exhibited greater proportion of CNAs compared with non-recurrent (N = 46) (mean 31.3% vs. 23%, respectively; P = 0.014), which was confirmed in an independent cohort. Candidate chromosome-specific aberrations included the gain of the chromosome arm 13q (P = 0.02; HR, 2.67) and loss of heterozygosity at 17q22-q24.3 (P = 0.05; HR, 2.69), both associated with shorter TTR. CNA load positively correlated with intratumor heterogeneity (R = 0.52; P < 0.0001), indicating ongoing chromosomal instability. Consistently, subclonal copy-number heterogeneity was associated with elevated risk of relapse (P = 0.028; HR, 2.20), which we did not observe for subclonal mutations. The clinico-genomic model rated an area under the curve of 0.83, achieving a 10% incremental gain compared to clinicopathological markers. In conclusion, tumor aneuploidy and copy-number heterogeneity were predictive of a poor outcome in early-stage colon cancer, and improved discriminative performance in comparison to clinicopathological data.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.5%
2
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
3
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.5%
4
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
7
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
8
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
9
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
10
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
14
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
15
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
25
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
27
Cell Death Discovery
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
29
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%