Stimulation-mediated reverse engineering of silent neural networks
Ren, X.; Hai, A.
Show abstract
Reconstructing connectivity of neuronal networks from single cell activity is essential to understanding brain function, but the challenge of deciphering connections from populations of silent neurons has been largely unmet. We demonstrate a protocol for deriving connectivity of realistic silent neuronal networks using stimulation combined with a supervised learning algorithm, that enables inferring connection weights with high fidelity and predicting spike trains at the single-spike and single-cell level with high accuracy. These testable predictions about the number and protocol of the required stimulations is expected to enhance future efforts for deriving neuronal connectivity and drive new experiments to better understand brain function.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Inferring monosynaptic connections from paired dendritic spine Ca2+ imaging and large-scale recording of extracellular spiking 96%
- Intensity- and frequency-specific effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation are explained by network dynamics 95%
- A biomimetic electrical stimulation strategy to induce asynchronous stochastic neural activity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stable recurrent dynamics in heterogeneous neuromorphic computing systems using excitatory and inhibitory plasticity 94%
- Decoupling of timescales reveals sparse convergent CPG network in the adult spinal cord 94%
- Spiking attractor model of motor cortex explains modulation of neural and behavioral variability by prior target information 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Adaptive delayed feedback control disrupts unwanted neuronal oscillations and adjusts to network synchronization dynamics 96%
- Biologically informed cortical models predict optogenetic perturbations 94%
- Estimating and interpreting nonlinear receptive fields of sensory responses with deep neural network models 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.