Back

Life without mismatch repair

Sanders, M. A.; Vöhringer, H. S.; Forster, V. J.; Moore, L.; Campbell, B. B.; Hooks, Y.; Edwards, M.; Bianchi, V.; Coorens, T.; Butler, T. M.; Lee-Six, H.; Robinson, P. S.; Flensburg, C.; Bilardi, R. A.; Majewski, I. J.; Reschke, A.; Cairney, E.; Crooks, B.; Lindhorst, S.; Stearns, D.; Tomboc, P.; McDermott, U.; Stratton, M.; Shlien, A.; Gerstung, M.; Tabori, U.; Campbell, P.

2021-04-15 genomics
10.1101/2021.04.14.437578 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mismatch repair (MMR) is a critical defence against mutation, but we lack quantification of its activity on different DNA lesions during human life. We performed whole-genome sequencing of normal and neoplastic tissues from individuals with constitutional MMR deficiency to establish the roles of MMR components, tissue type and disease state in somatic mutation rates. Mutational signatures varied extensively across genotypes, some coupled to leading-strand replication, some to lagging-strand replication and some independent of replication, implying that the various MMR components engage different forms of DNA damage. Loss of MSH2 or MSH6 (MutS), but not MLH1 or PMS2 (MutL), caused 5-methylcytosine-dependent hypermutation, indicating that MutS is the pivotal complex for repairing spontaneous deamination of methylated cytosines in humans. Neoplastic change altered the distribution of mutational signatures, particularly accelerating replication-coupled indel signatures. Each component of MMR repairs 1-10 lesions/day per normal human cell, and many thousands of additional events during neoplastic transformation. HighlightsO_LIMMR repairs 1-10 lesions/day in every normal cell and thousands more in tumor cells C_LIO_LIMMR patterns and rates are shaped by genotype, tissue type and malignant transformation C_LIO_LIMSH2 and MSH6 are pivotal for repairing spontaneous deamination of methylated cytosine C_LIO_LIReplication indels and substitutions vary by leading versus lagging strand and genotype C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.