Back

Identification of beneficial and detrimental bacteria that impact sorghum responses to drought using multi-scale and multi-system microbiome comparisons

Qi, M.; Berry, J. C.; Veley, K.; O'Connor, L.; Finkel, O. M.; Salas-Gonzalez, I.; Kuhs, M.; Jupe, J.; Holcomb, E.; Glavina del Rio, T.; Creech, C.; Liu, P.; Tringe, S. G.; Dangl, J. L.; Schachtman, D.; Bart, R.

2021-04-14 microbiology
10.1101/2021.04.13.437608 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDrought is a major abiotic stress that limits agricultural productivity. Previous field-level experiments have demonstrated that drought decreases microbiome diversity in the root and rhizosphere and may lead to enrichment of specific groups of microbes, such as Actinobacteria. How these changes ultimately affect plant health is not well understood. In parallel, model systems have been used to tease apart the specific interactions between plants and single, or small groups of microbes. However, translating this work into crop species and achieving increased crop yields within noisy field settings remains a challenge. Thus, the next scientific leap forward in microbiome research must cross the great lab-to-field divide. Toward this end, we combined reductionist, transitional and ecological approaches, applied to the staple cereal crop sorghum to identify key beneficial and detrimental, root associated microbes that robustly affect drought stressed plant phenotypes. ResultsFifty-three bacterial strains, originally characterized for association with Arabidopsis, were applied to sorghum seeds and their effect on root growth was monitored for seven days. Two Arthrobacter strains, members of the Actinobacteria phylum, caused root growth inhibition (RGI) in Arabidopsis and sorghum. In the context of synthetic communities, strains of Variovorax were able to protect both Arabidopsis and sorghum from the RGI caused by Arthrobacter. As a transitional system, we tested the synthetic communities through a 24-day high-throughput sorghum phenotyping assay and found that during drought stress, plants colonized by Arthrobacter were significantly smaller and had reduced leaf water content as compared to control plants. However, plants colonized by both Arthrobacter and Variovorax performed as well or better than control plants. In parallel, we performed a field trial wherein sorghum was evaluated across well-watered and drought conditions. Drought responsive microbes were identified, including an enrichment in Actinobacteria, consistent with previous findings. By incorporating data on soil properties into the microbiome analysis, we accounted for experimental noise with a newly developed method and were then able to observe that the abundance of Arthrobacter strains negatively correlated with plant growth. Having validated this approach, we cross-referenced datasets from the high-throughput phenotyping and field experiments and report a list of high confidence bacterial taxa that positively associated with plant growth under drought stress. ConclusionsA three-tiered experimental system connected reductionist and ecological approaches and identified beneficial and deleterious bacterial strains for sorghum under drought stress.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.4%
2
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
3
Phytobiomes Journal
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
5
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
6
Plant and Soil
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
8
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
11
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
12
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
16
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
21
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
23
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
24
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
26
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
30
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%