Back

Random-effect based test for multinomial logistic regression: choice of the reference level and its impact on the testing

He, Q.; Liu, Y.; Liu, M.; Wu, M.; Hsu, L.

2021-04-19 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2021.04.13.21255272 medRxiv
Show abstract

Random-effect score test has become an important tool for studying the association between a set of genetic variants and a disease outcome. While a number of random-effect score test approaches have been proposed in the literature, similar approaches for multinomial logistic regression have received less attention. In a recent effort to develop random-effect score test for multinomial logistic regression, we made the observation that such a test is not invariant to the choice of the reference level. This is intriguing because binary logistic regression is well-known to possess the invariance property with respect to the reference level. Here, we investigate why the multinomial logistic regression is not invariant to the reference level, and derive analytic forms to study how the choice of the reference level influences the power. Then we consider several potential procedures that are invariant to the reference level, and compare their performance through numerical studies. Our work provides valuable insights into the properties of multinomial logistic regression with respect to random-effect score test, and adds a useful tool for studying the genetic heterogeneity of complex diseases.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.6%
4
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.6%
5
Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.0%
7
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.5%
11
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.9%
14
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Theoretical Population Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
18
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
21
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
29
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%