Selection in a growing bacterial/yeast colony biases results of mutation accumulation experiments.

Mutations provide the raw material for natural selection to act. Therefore, understanding the variety and relative frequency of different type of mutations is critical to understanding the nature of genetic diversity in a population. Mutation accumulation (MA) experiments have been used in this context to estimate parameters defining mutation rates, distribution of fitness effects (DFE), and spectrum of mutations. MA experiments performed with organisms such as Drosophila have an effective population size of one. However, in MA experiments with bacteria and yeast, a single founder is allowed to grow to a size of a colony (~108). The effective population size in these experiments is of the order of 10. In this scenario, while it is assumed that natural selection plays a minimal role in dictating the dynamics of colony growth and therefore, the MA experiment; this effect has not been tested explicitly. In this work, we simulate colony growth and perform an MA experiment, and demonstrate that selection ensures that, in an MA experiment, fraction of all mutations that are beneficial is over represented by a factor greater than two. The DFE of beneficial and deleterious mutations are accurately captured in an MA experiment. We show that the effect of selection in a growing colony varies non-monotonically and that, in the face of natural selection dictating an MA experiment, estimates of mutation rate of an organism is not trivial. We perform experiments with 160 MA lines of E. coli, and demonstrate that rate of change of mean fitness is a non-monotonic function of the colony size, and that selection acts differently in different sectors of a growing colony. Overall, we demonstrate that the results of MA experiments need to be revisited taking into account the action of selection in a growing colony.