Back

One-Seq: A Highly Scalable Sequencing-Based Diagnostic for SARS-CoV-2 and Other Single-Stranded Viruses

Dai, M.; Ma, W.; Kang, H.; Sonnett, M.; Church, G. M.; Kirschner, M. W.

2021-04-14 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.04.12.21253357 medRxiv
Show abstract

The management of pandemics such as COVID-19 requires highly scalable and sensitive viral diagnostics, together with variant identification. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has many attractive features for highly multiplexed testing, however current sequencing-based methods are limited in throughput by early processing steps on individual samples (e.g. RNA extraction and PCR amplification). Here we report a new method, "One-Seq", that eliminates the current bottlenecks in scalability by enabling early pooling of samples, before any extraction or amplification steps. To enable early pooling, we developed a one-pot reaction for efficient reverse transcription (RT) and upfront barcoding in extraction-free clinical samples, and a "protector" strategy in which carefully designed competing oligonucleotides prevent barcode crosstalk and preserve detection of the high dynamic range of viral load in clinical samples. This method is highly sensitive, achieving a limit of detection (LoD) down to 2.5 genome copy equivalent (gce) in contrived RT samples, 10 gce in multiplexed sequencing, and 2-5 gce with multi-primer detection, suggesting an LoD of 200-500 gce/ml for clinical testing. In clinical specimens, One-Seq showed quantitative viral detection against clinical Ct values with 6 logs of linear dynamic range and detection of SARS-CoV-2 positive samples down to [~]360 gce/ml. In addition, One-Seq reports a number of hotspot viral mutations at equal scalability at no extra cost. Scaling up One-Seq would allow a throughput of 100,000-1,000,000 tests per day per single clinical lab, at an estimated amortized reagent cost of $1.5 per test and turn-around time of 7.5-15 hr.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.