Online Closed-Loop Real-Time tES-fMRI for Brain Modulation: Feasibility, Noise/Safety and Pilot Study
Mulyana, B.; Tsuchiyagaito, A.; Smith, J.; Misaki, M.; Kuplicki, R.; Soleimani, G.; Rashedi, A.; Shereen, D.; Bergmann, T. O.; Cheng, S.; Paulus, M. P.; Bodurka, J.; Ekhtiari, H.
Show abstract
Recent studies suggest that transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) can be performed during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The novel approach of using concurrent tES-fMRI to modulate and measure targeted brain activity/connectivity may provide unique insights into the causal interactions between the brain neural responses and psychiatric/neurologic signs and symptoms, and importantly, guide the development of new treatments. However, tES stimulation parameters to optimally influence the underlying brain activity in health and disorder may vary with respect to phase, frequency, intensity and electrodes montage. Here, we delineate how a closed-loop tES-fMRI study of frontoparietal network modulation can be designed and performed. We also discuss the challenges of running a concurrent tES-fMRI, describing how we can distinguish clinically meaningful physiological changes caused by tES from tES-related artifacts. There is a large methodological parameter space including electrode types, electrolytes, electrode montages, concurrent tES-fMRI hardware, online fMRI processing pipelines and closed-loop optimization algorithms that should be carefully selected for closed-loop tES-fMRI brain modulation. We also provide technical details on how safety and quality of tES-fMRI settings can be tested, and how these settings can be monitored during the study to ensure they do not exceed safety standards. The initial results of feasibility and applicability of closed-loop tES-fMRI are reported and potential hypotheses for the outcomes are discussed. Highlight pointsO_LIMethodological details of a closed-loop tES-fMRI study protocol are provided. C_LIO_LIThe protocol is performed successfully on a frontoparietal network without side-effects. C_LIO_LIThe temperature of electrodes in concurrent tES-fMRI remains in the safe range. C_LIO_LIProperly setup concurrent tES does not introduce MRI artifacts and noise. C_LIO_LISimplex optimizer could be used to find an optimal tES stimulation parameter. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A library for fMRI real-time processing systems in python (RTPSpy) with comprehensive online noise reduction, fast and accurate anatomical image processing, and online processing simulation 96%
- Spatial (Mis)match Between EEG and fMRI Signal Patterns Revealed by Spatio-Spectral Source-Space EEG Decomposition 95%
- A sparse EEG-informed fMRI model for hybrid EEG-fMRI neurofeedback prediction 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Data-driven beamforming techniques to attenuate ballistocardiogram (BCG) artefacts in EEG-fMRI without detecting cardiac pulses in electrocardiography (ECG) recordings 96%
- Are we really targeting and stimulating DLPFC by placing transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) electrodes over F3/F4? 95%
- Identification of cortical targets for modulating function supported by the human hippocampal network 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.