Back

Plasmid fitness costs are caused by specific genetic conflicts

Hall, J. P. J.; Wright, R. C. T.; Harrison, E.; Muddiman, K. J.; Wood, J.; Paterson, S.; Brockhurst, M.

2021-04-11 microbiology
10.1101/2021.04.10.439128 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plasmids play an important role in bacterial genome evolution by transferring genes between lineages. Fitness costs associated with plasmid acquisition are expected to be a barrier to gene exchange, but the causes of plasmid fitness costs are poorly understood. Single compensatory mutations are often sufficient to completely ameliorate plasmid fitness costs, suggesting that such costs are caused by specific genetic conflicts rather than generic properties of plasmids, such as their size, metabolic burden, or expression level. Here we show -- using a combination of experimental evolution, reverse genetics, and transcriptomics -- that fitness costs of two divergent large plasmids in Pseudomonas fluorescens are caused by inducing maladaptive expression of a chromosomal tailocin toxin operon. Mutations in single genes unrelated to the toxin operon, and located on either the chromosome or the plasmid, ameliorated the disruption associated with plasmid acquisition. We identify one of these compensatory loci, the chromosomal gene PFLU4242, as the key mediator of the fitness costs of both plasmids, with the other compensatory loci either reducing expression of this gene or mitigating its deleterious effects by upregulating a putative plasmid-borne ParAB operon. The chromosomal mobile genetic element Tn6291, which uses plasmids for transmission, remained upregulated even in compensated strains, suggesting that mobile genetic elements communicate through pathways independent of general physiological disruption. Plasmid fitness costs caused by specific genetic conflicts are unlikely to act as a long-term barrier to horizontal gene transfer due to their propensity for amelioration by single compensatory mutations, explaining why plasmids are so common in bacterial genomes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.4%
2
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
3
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.8%
4
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.8%
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Microbiology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
7
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
9
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.6%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.4%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.4%
13
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
Journal of Bacteriology
212 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
15
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
16
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
19
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.1%
21
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
22
Nature Microbiology
155 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Molecular Microbiology
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
25
Genomics
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%