Symptoms network analysis of serious mental illness: A cross disasters comparison
Levin, Y.; Bachem, R.; Goodwin, R.; Ben-Ezra, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-6) has been used worldwide in community epidemiological surveys and served as a screening measure for serious mental illness in the general population. We take a novel approach by examining the symptoms network of the K-6 and the exploration of differences between three types of disasters: Nature related, Terror attacks, and COVID-19. AimsTo explore the K-6 symptoms network and its structure replication across the three types of disasters. MethodsA network analysis of psychological distress symptoms as assessed by the K-6 was conducted using data from 9,271 participants from different disaster samples: Terror (n = 5842), COVID-19 (n = 2428), and Nature related (n = 1001). ResultsWhile there were extensive connections between items across all disaster samples, network structure differed across the disaster types. While after a nature related disaster and the COVID-19 pandemic depression- and anxiety-items were interconnected, a terror attack resulted in more separated manifestations of anxiety and depression. Centrality analysis showed "depressed/no cheering up" to be the node with the highest strength centrality in all networks; in the Nature-related network, "restless or fidgety" was also highly central. ConclusionsResults provide evidence of different psychological distress structures in different disasters. Depending on the type of disaster, trauma-focused interventions may need to be augmented, with specific components directed at depression and/or anxiety.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The influence of repeated mild lockdown on mental and physical health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a large-scale longitudinal study in Japan 94%
- Loneliness and diurnal cortisol levels during COVID-19 lockdown: the roles of living situation, relationship status and relationship quality 93%
- Yet another lockdown? A large-scale study on people’s unwillingness to be confined during the first 5 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characteristics of mental health stability during COVID-19: An online survey with people residing in the Liverpool City Region 95%
- Why the COVID-19 pandemic is a traumatic stressor 93%
- Changes in hospital staff mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic: longitudinal results from the international COPE-CORONA study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Closed Doors: Predictors of Stress, Anxiety, Depression, and PTSD During the Onset of COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil 92%
- Long-term Trajectories of Depressive Symptoms in Deployed Military Personnel: A 10-year prospective study 92%
- Screening for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder following Childbirth using the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- "What matters in help-seeking and disclosure intent of intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic:Similarities and differences across demographic groups" 91%
- Lowered quality of life in Long COVID is strongly predicted by affective symptoms and chronic fatigue syndrome which are associated with inflammatory processes during the acute infectious phase and consequent neuroimmunotoxic pathways 91%
- Have deaths of despair risen during the COVID-19 pandemic? A rapid systematic review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The prevalence and influencing factors for anxiety in medical workers fighting COVID-19 in China: A cross-sectional survey 90%
- Trust in the scientific research community predicts intent to comply with COVID-19 prevention measures: An analysis of a large-scale international survey dataset 89%
- Contact patterns before and during the UK’s Autumn 2020 COVID-19 lockdown among university students and staff 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.