Double-observer approach with camera traps: Towards an unbiased density estimation of unmarked animal populations
Nakashima, Y.; Hongo, S.; Mizuno, K.; Yajima, G.; Dzefck, Z. C. B.
Show abstract
Camera traps are a powerful tool for wildlife surveys. However, camera traps may not always detect animals passing in front. This constraint may create a substantial bias in estimating critical parameters such as the density of unmarked populations. We proposed the double-observer approach with camera traps to counter the constraint, which involves setting up a paired camera trap at a station and correcting imperfect detection with a hierarchal capture-recapture model for stratified populations. We performed simulations to evaluate this approachs reliability and determine how to obtain desirable data for this approach. We then applied it to 12 mammals in Japan and Cameroon. The results showed that the approach could correct imperfect detection as long as paired camera traps detect animals nearly independently (Correlation coefficient < 0.2). Camera traps should be installed to monitor a predefined small focal area from different directions to satisfy this requirement. The field surveys showed that camera trap might miss animals by 3 %-40%, suggesting that current density estimation models relying on perfect detection may underestimate animal density by the same order of magnitude. We hope that our approach will be incorporated into existing density estimation models to improve their accuracy.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using known births to account for delayed marking in population estimation of North Atlantic right whales 92%
- Modeling the demography of species providing extended parental care: A capture-recapture multievent model with a case study on Polar Bears (Ursus maritimus) 92%
- Too few, too many, or just right? Optimizing sample sizes for population-level inferences in animal tracking projects 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards an automated protocol for wildlife density estimation using camera-traps 95%
- Analysing biodiversity observation data collected in continuous time: Should we use discrete- or continuous-time occupancy models? 94%
- One size does not fit all: a novel approach for determining the Realised Viewshed Size for remote camera traps 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Insights on the effect of mega-carcass abundance on the population dynamics of a facultative scavenger predator and its prey 94%
- Using informative priors to account for identifiability issues in occupancy models with identification errors 94%
- Long term trend and short-term dynamics of a willow ptarmigan population 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning goes wild: Using data from captive individuals to infer wildlife behaviour 93%
- Seasonal and annual fluctuations of deer populations estimated by a Bayesian state-space model 92%
- Camera traps unable to determine whether plasticine models of caterpillars reliably measure bird predation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Abundance estimation from genetic mark-recapture data when not all sites are sampled: an example with the bowhead whale 94%
- Use of object detection in camera trap image identification: assessing a method to rapidly and accurately classify human and animal detections for research and application in recreation ecology 93%
- Spatial behaviors and seasonal habitat use of the increasingly endangered thick-billed parrot (Rhynchopsitta pachyrhyncha) 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.