Back

Genome-wide mediation analysis: bridging the dividebetween genotype and phenotype via transcriptomicdata in maize

Yang, Z.; Xu, G.; Zhang, Q.; OBATA, T.; Yang, J.

2021-04-11 genetics
10.1101/2021.04.09.439238 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mapping genotype to phenotype is an essential topic in genetics and genomics research. As the Omics data become increasingly available, genome-wide association study (GWAS) has been widely applied to establish the relationship between genotype and phenotype. However, signals detected by GWAS usually span broad genomic regions with many underneath candidate genes, making it challenging to interpret and validate the molecular functions of the candidate genes. Under the context of genetics research, we hypothesized a causal chain from genotype to phenotype partially mediated by intermediate molecular processes, i.e., gene expression. To test this hypothesis, we applied the high dimensional mediation analysis, a class of causal inference method with an assumed causal chain from the exposure to the mediator to the outcome, and implemented it to the maize diversity panel (N=280 lines). Using 40 publicly available agronomic traits, 66 newly generated metabolic traits, and published RNA-seq data from seven different tissues, we detected N=736 unique mediating genes, explaining an average of 12.7% phenotypic variance due to mediation. Noticeably, 83/736 (11%) genes were identified in mediating more than one trait, suggesting the prevalence of pleiotropic mediating effects. Among those pleiotropic mediators, benzox-azinone synthesis 13 (Bx13), a well-characterized gene encoding a 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase, was identified mediating 40 agronomic and metabolic traits in different tissues. Further genetic and genomic analyses of the Bx13 and adjacent mediating genes suggested a 3D co-regulation modulation likely affect their expression levels and eventually lead to phenotypic consequences. Our results suggested the genome-wide mediation analysis is a powerful tool to integrate Omics data in providing causal inference to connect genotype to phenotype.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.8%
3
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.3%
6
Molecular Plant
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
7
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.9%
8
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
10
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
14
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.2%
17
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
21
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
28
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%